Planning application · Bromley
24/02332/FULL1.
5 Adcock Walk, Orpington, BR6 9SY
Full / Other Planning at 5 Adcock Walk, Orpington, BR6 9SY, received 19 Jun 2024 — refused on 17 Jan 2025 by committee.
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationBromley profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Jan 2025
30 wks
Decision time
22 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
30
Documents
30 linked
15
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Bromley planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Proposed Change of Use from C3 residential to C2 residential care home for up to 3 children between the ages of 7 - 17
Reference
24/02332/FULL1
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
BR6 9SY
Ward
Council
Received
19 Jun 2024
Validated
4 Jul 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
17 Jan 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Reference
24/02332/FULL1
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Not recorded
Postcode
BR6 9SY
Ward
Council
Received
19 Jun 2024
Validated
4 Jul 2024
Target date
7 Aug 2024
Decision date
17 Jan 2025
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decision Made
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Jan 2025, determined by the planning committee — 30 weeks from submission (22 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
19 Jun 2024
Application received
4 Jul 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
17 Jan 2025
Committee decision: Refused
19 Jun 2024
Application received
4 Jul 2024
Application validated
7 Aug 2024
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Jan 2025
Committee decision: Refused
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
15
In support
0
Total comments
16
Objections
15
In support
0
Total comments
16
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer not recorded
No case officer is recorded.
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.