Planning Atlas
AtlasConsultantsAccent Bda
Planning AtlasConsultantsAccent BDA
Planning consultancy · London

Accent BDA.

A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 73% of applicationsbelow the London average of 79% — across 82 applications in 15 boroughs, 2000–12.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.

Planning consultancy13 years active15 boroughs73% approval2570th in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 1 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
82
Applications
London 2000–12
0
Appeals
no appeal on record — every decision stood
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 60 decided applications
Why is Accent BDA listed as a consultant?It is recorded as the planning agent on 82 applications.Is this your firm? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
Accent BDA
70
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
AccentBDA
12
67%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
82
73%
Each application counted once across all components
Accent BDA
70
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
AccentBDA
12
67%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
82
73%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: Accent BDA” (44) · Accent Bda” (16) · AccentBDA” (5) · ACCENT BDA” (5) · ` Accent BDA” (5) · AccentBDA Ltd” (2) · Accentbda” (2) · Accent Bda Limited” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
0%50%100%’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’09’11’12
What they submit — by scheme type
83decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]

The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data

How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
18
78% (14/4)
15
60% (9/6)
11
82% (9/2)
7
2 approved · 5 refused
7
5 approved · 2 refused
6
3 approved · 3 refused
4
1 approved · 3 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
3
1 approved · 2 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
18
78% (14/4)
15
60% (9/6)
11
82% (9/2)
Show all 15 rows
7
2 approved · 5 refused
7
5 approved · 2 refused
6
3 approved · 3 refused
4
1 approved · 3 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
3
1 approved · 2 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused

Where this firm's applications concentrate, 2000–12.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/2008/3143
Full Application
Approved
2009-01-08
08/04322/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-07-08
08/01494/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-06-12
07/07861/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-02-14
2008/0275/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-02-12
P/2007/4336
Full Application
Refused
2007-11-02
2007/4967
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2007-10-22
07/AP/1905
Minor application
Refused
2007-10-03
PA/07/01940
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-09-21
PA/07/01941
Listed Building Consent (S8 P&LBC 1990)
Approved
2007-09-21
07/04823/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2007-08-24
2006/02956/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-06-27
2007/00740/FUL
Full Planning Application
Refused
2007-05-03
P/2006/3003
Full Application
Approved
2007-04-27
P/3202/06
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-12
P/3204/06
Full Planning Application
Refused
2007-01-05
06/3052
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-07
2006/5207/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2006-12-01
2006/5086/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-01
06/AP/1856
Change of Use
Refused
2006-11-30
06/2016
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-09-26
2006/4043/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-09-05
06/0572
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-09-01
2006/2438/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-06-19
06/01692/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2006-05-09
2006/1950/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-04-28
PA/06/00359
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-04-27
P/265/06/CFU
Full Planning Application
Refused
2006-04-25
06/00054/FULL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-03-16
P/2006/0093
Full Application
Refused
2006-03-06
05/00992/FULL
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-01-27
05/09088/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2006-01-10
P/2639/05/CFU
Full Planning Application
Withdrawn
2005-12-19
05/AP/2076
Change of Use
Approved
2005-11-24
P051622
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-08-26
2005/1228
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-07-29
2005/01303/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-07-29
2005/1233
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-07-28
2005/00323/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-04-13
2004/4154/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-01-14
2004/4267/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-10-12
TP/04/1283
Full
Withdrawn
2004-09-10
04/05211/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2004-08-13
P/2004/1236
Full Application
Approved
2004-05-20
P/2003/4460
Full Application
Refused
2004-01-02
03/05072/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-12-23
03/2576
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-12-12
2003/1370
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-10-09
03/04928/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-08-29
2003/0598
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-20
2003/1054/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-07-15
P/2003/0692
Full Application
Split
2003-06-05
03/0913
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-05-28
03/00563/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-03-12
2002/1218
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-01-14
2002/02678/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-01-07
P/2002/2468
Full Application
Approved
2002-12-10
2002/02433/FUL
Full Planning Application
2002-10-01
P/2008/3143
Full Application
Approved
2009-01-08
Show all 60 rows
08/04322/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-07-08
08/01494/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-06-12
07/07861/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2008-02-14
2008/0275/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-02-12
P/2007/4336
Full Application
Refused
2007-11-02
2007/4967
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2007-10-22
07/AP/1905
Minor application
Refused
2007-10-03
PA/07/01940
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-09-21
PA/07/01941
Listed Building Consent (S8 P&LBC 1990)
Approved
2007-09-21
07/04823/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2007-08-24
2006/02956/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-06-27
2007/00740/FUL
Full Planning Application
Refused
2007-05-03
P/2006/3003
Full Application
Approved
2007-04-27
P/3202/06
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-12
P/3204/06
Full Planning Application
Refused
2007-01-05
06/3052
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-07
2006/5207/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2006-12-01
2006/5086/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-12-01
06/AP/1856
Change of Use
Refused
2006-11-30
06/2016
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-09-26
2006/4043/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-09-05
06/0572
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-09-01
2006/2438/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-06-19
06/01692/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2006-05-09
2006/1950/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-04-28
PA/06/00359
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-04-27
P/265/06/CFU
Full Planning Application
Refused
2006-04-25
06/00054/FULL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-03-16
P/2006/0093
Full Application
Refused
2006-03-06
05/00992/FULL
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-01-27
05/09088/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2006-01-10
P/2639/05/CFU
Full Planning Application
Withdrawn
2005-12-19
05/AP/2076
Change of Use
Approved
2005-11-24
P051622
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-08-26
2005/1228
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-07-29
2005/01303/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-07-29
2005/1233
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2005-07-28
2005/00323/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-04-13
2004/4154/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-01-14
2004/4267/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-10-12
TP/04/1283
Full
Withdrawn
2004-09-10
04/05211/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2004-08-13
P/2004/1236
Full Application
Approved
2004-05-20
P/2003/4460
Full Application
Refused
2004-01-02
03/05072/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-12-23
03/2576
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-12-12
2003/1370
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-10-09
03/04928/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-08-29
2003/0598
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-20
2003/1054/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-07-15
P/2003/0692
Full Application
Split
2003-06-05
03/0913
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-05-28
03/00563/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-03-12
2002/1218
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-01-14
2002/02678/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-01-07
P/2002/2468
Full Application
Approved
2002-12-10
2002/02433/FUL
Full Planning Application
2002-10-01
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmAccent BDA
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage15 London boroughs
Years active13 (2000–12)
Applications82
Approval rate73%
London avg79%
London rank2570th of 51,699
Related investigations
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
How every consultancy ranks →
Approval rate and scheme mix across London consultancies — the full track record.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 2000–12. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
  2. [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
  3. [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.