Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersAitch Group
Planning AtlasDevelopersAitch Group
Developer · London

Aitch Group.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 89 applications in 14 boroughs, seeking 866 residential units, at a 81% approval rate, 2000–d .[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer866 units sought14 boroughs81% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
89
Applications
London 2000–d
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (89) and agent (68); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’00’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’10’11’12’13’15’16’18’19’23
What they build — by scheme type
118decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 2000–d .[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Permit
Wed 14 Nov
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Permit
Wed 06 Mar
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Permit
Thu 31 May
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Permit
Wed 14 Nov
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Permit
Wed 06 Mar
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Permit
Thu 31 May
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 89 applications →
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperAitch Group
Coverage14 London boroughs
Applications89 (2000–d )
Units sought866
Approval rate81%
London rank#334 of 16,342
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.