Planning Atlas
AtlasConsultantsComplete Technical Services
Planning AtlasConsultantsComplete Technical Services Ltd
Planning consultancy · London

Complete Technical Services Ltd.

A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 84% of applicationsabove the London average of 79% — across 274 applications in 25 boroughs, 1997–20.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.

Planning consultancy24 years active25 boroughs84% approval615th in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
274
Applications
London 1997–20
Appeal success
fewer than 5 appeals on record for this firm
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 224 decided applications
Why a consultant? Listed as a consultant because they appear as the agent on 274 applications and as the applicant on only 5.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your firm?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
0%50%100%’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’20
What they submit — by scheme type
274decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]

The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data

How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

Applications by borough

Where this firm's applications concentrate, 1997–20.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
081396
Full Planning
Approved
2020-11-16
090597
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
13/13019/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2014-01-23
13/01839/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-01-03
13/01741/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-12-20
13/01785/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-12-13
131809
Full Planning
No determination
2013-10-24
12/03273/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2012-07-03
PA/11/02201/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-12-06
11/02874/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-14
PA/11/02344/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-07
11/02108/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-03
11/07774/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2011-10-04
0786/11
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-08-25
11/00853/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2011-07-28
11/1262/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-07-19
11/02667/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2011-07-12
PA/11/01112/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-07-01
111388
Full Planning
Approved
2011-06-06
PP/2011/1324
Full Application
Approved
2011-05-26
11/02713/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2011-05-12
11/00015/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-08
11/0190
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-04
2011/0868/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-02-21
101000
Full Planning
Refused
2011-02-08
10/04052/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2011-01-28
2011/0272/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-25
10/02975/P
Full planning permission
Approved
2011-01-25
2010/6671/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-12-15
DC/10/075485/FT
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-19
2010/5860/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-09
PA/10/00726/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-10-28
2010/5651/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-10-21
10/04504/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2010-09-24
B/02691/10
Full Application
Approved
2010-09-13
10/1783
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-25
2010/4209/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-09
PP/2010/2310
Full Application
Approved
2010-07-20
2010/3153/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-06-15
10/P0981
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-05-20
10/02698/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2010-05-20
2010/1857/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-04-16
DC/10/074132/X
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-04
10/0237
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-03-31
2010/1077/L
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2010-03-08
2010/1050/P
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2010-03-08
09/P2051
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-11-19
P091777
Full Planning Application
Approved
2009-10-29
091426
Full Planning
Approved
2009-10-28
09/01517/P
Full planning permission
Approved
2009-08-14
091594
Full Planning
Refused
2009-08-11
09/1311/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2009-07-27
09/01027/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-06-04
09/0668
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-29
2009/1139/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-07
2009/0862/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-02-24
08/09708/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2009-01-07
P082102
Full Planning Application
Approved
2008-12-12
08/01773/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-09
08/2765
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-01
081396
Full Planning
Approved
2020-11-16
090597
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
13/13019/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2014-01-23
Show all 60 rows
13/01839/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-01-03
13/01741/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-12-20
13/01785/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-12-13
131809
Full Planning
No determination
2013-10-24
12/03273/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2012-07-03
PA/11/02201/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-12-06
11/02874/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-14
PA/11/02344/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-07
11/02108/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-03
11/07774/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2011-10-04
0786/11
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-08-25
11/00853/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2011-07-28
11/1262/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-07-19
11/02667/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2011-07-12
PA/11/01112/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-07-01
111388
Full Planning
Approved
2011-06-06
PP/2011/1324
Full Application
Approved
2011-05-26
11/02713/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2011-05-12
11/00015/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-08
11/0190
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-04
2011/0868/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-02-21
101000
Full Planning
Refused
2011-02-08
10/04052/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2011-01-28
2011/0272/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-01-25
10/02975/P
Full planning permission
Approved
2011-01-25
2010/6671/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-12-15
DC/10/075485/FT
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-19
2010/5860/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-09
PA/10/00726/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-10-28
2010/5651/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-10-21
10/04504/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2010-09-24
B/02691/10
Full Application
Approved
2010-09-13
10/1783
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-25
2010/4209/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-09
PP/2010/2310
Full Application
Approved
2010-07-20
2010/3153/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-06-15
10/P0981
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-05-20
10/02698/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2010-05-20
2010/1857/P
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-04-16
DC/10/074132/X
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-04
10/0237
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-03-31
2010/1077/L
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
2010-03-08
2010/1050/P
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2010-03-08
09/P2051
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-11-19
P091777
Full Planning Application
Approved
2009-10-29
091426
Full Planning
Approved
2009-10-28
09/01517/P
Full planning permission
Approved
2009-08-14
091594
Full Planning
Refused
2009-08-11
09/1311/FUL
Full Application
Approved
2009-07-27
09/01027/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-06-04
09/0668
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-29
2009/1139/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-07
2009/0862/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-02-24
08/09708/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2009-01-07
P082102
Full Planning Application
Approved
2008-12-12
08/01773/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-09
08/2765
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-01
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmComplete Technical Services Ltd
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage25 London boroughs
Years active24 (1997–20)
Applications274
Approval rate84%
London avg79%
London rank615th of 46,134
Related investigations
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
How every consultancy ranks →
Approval rate and scheme mix across London consultancies — the full track record.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 1997–20. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
  2. [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
  3. [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.