Planning Atlas
AtlasConsultantsK B Kumar
Planning AtlasConsultantsK B Kumar
Planning consultancy · London

K B Kumar.

A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 66% of applicationsbelow the London average of 79% — across 183 applications in 17 boroughs, 2004–20.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.

Planning consultancy17 years active17 boroughs66% approval951st in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
183
Applications
London 2004–20
0
Appeals
no appeal on record — every decision stood
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 175 decided applications
Why is K B Kumar listed as a consultant?It is recorded as the planning agent on 183 applications.Is this your firm? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
K B Kumar
121
67%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
K.B. Kumar
58
63%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
K.B.Kumar
4
75%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
183
66%
Each application counted once across all components
K B Kumar
121
67%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
K.B. Kumar
58
63%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
K.B.Kumar
4
75%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Show all 4 rows
Total
183
66%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: K B Kumar” (97) · K.B. Kumar” (48) · K. B. Kumar” (21) · K.B Kumar” (7) · K.B.Kumar” (4) · KB Kumar” (2) · K B kumar” (2) · K B KUMAR” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
0%50%100%’04’05’06’07’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15’16’20
What they submit — by scheme type
183decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]

The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data

How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
82
62% (51/31)
48
60% (29/19)
12
50% (6/6)
6
4 approved · 2 refused
5
2 approved · 3 refused
4
4 approved · 0 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
82
62% (51/31)
48
60% (29/19)
12
50% (6/6)
Show all 17 rows
6
4 approved · 2 refused
5
2 approved · 3 refused
4
4 approved · 0 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
2
1 approved · 1 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused

Where this firm's applications concentrate, 2004–20.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
050419
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
051653
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
080753
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
081867
Full Planning
Approved
2020-11-16
091501
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
P0386.20
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2020-08-07
16/02371/FUL
Full
Refused
2016-08-18
P2015/4063/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2015-12-15
15/0390
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-04-08
14/01366/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-02-05
14/00979/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-10-23
1260/14
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-07-11
130563
Full Planning
Refused
2013-07-02
13/0757
Householder
Approved
2013-06-10
130346
Full Planning
Approved
2013-05-20
P/2012/1882
Full Application
Refused
2012-06-25
P12-00285PLA
Full
Refused
2012-04-23
111605
Full Planning
Refused
2012-01-09
P/2011/4425
Full Application
Approved
2011-12-20
P/2011/3262
Full Application
Approved
2011-09-23
11/00678/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-09-21
0242/11
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-06-20
0696/11
Householder
Refused
2011-05-20
0626/11
Householder
Refused
2011-05-16
110742
Full Planning
Approved
2011-02-25
10/2580
Householder
Approved
2010-11-30
1535/10
Householder
Refused
2010-11-17
100387
Full Planning
Refused
2010-09-21
10/01492/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-09-16
1585/10
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-09-10
1552/10
Householder
Approved
2010-08-20
10/00574/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-17
100268
Full Planning
Approved
2010-06-16
TP/09/1833
Full
Refused
2010-06-04
0243/10
Householder
Refused
2010-05-21
10/00079/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-04-01
091206
Full Planning
Approved
2010-01-06
091279
Full Planning
Refused
2009-12-09
091455
Full Planning
Approved
2009-12-09
2009/3098
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2009-10-29
1950/09
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-10-16
09/01268/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-10-09
090329
Full Planning
Approved
2009-10-05
090711
Full Planning
Refused
2009-07-22
PA/09/00267
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-07-06
1028/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-06-30
09/00456/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2009-06-01
090263
Full Planning
Approved
2009-05-29
090301
Full Planning
Refused
2009-05-28
09/0582/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-05-11
09/0583/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2009-05-11
090800
Full Planning
Approved
2009-05-08
0333/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-09
090907
Full Planning
Refused
2009-03-23
0340/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-03-18
090438
Full Planning
Approved
2009-03-03
08/01672/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-02-06
2878/08
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-15
PA/08/02155/R
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-12-01
050419
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
051653
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
080753
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
Show all 60 rows
081867
Full Planning
Approved
2020-11-16
091501
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
P0386.20
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2020-08-07
16/02371/FUL
Full
Refused
2016-08-18
P2015/4063/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2015-12-15
15/0390
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-04-08
14/01366/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-02-05
14/00979/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-10-23
1260/14
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-07-11
130563
Full Planning
Refused
2013-07-02
13/0757
Householder
Approved
2013-06-10
130346
Full Planning
Approved
2013-05-20
P/2012/1882
Full Application
Refused
2012-06-25
P12-00285PLA
Full
Refused
2012-04-23
111605
Full Planning
Refused
2012-01-09
P/2011/4425
Full Application
Approved
2011-12-20
P/2011/3262
Full Application
Approved
2011-09-23
11/00678/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-09-21
0242/11
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-06-20
0696/11
Householder
Refused
2011-05-20
0626/11
Householder
Refused
2011-05-16
110742
Full Planning
Approved
2011-02-25
10/2580
Householder
Approved
2010-11-30
1535/10
Householder
Refused
2010-11-17
100387
Full Planning
Refused
2010-09-21
10/01492/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-09-16
1585/10
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-09-10
1552/10
Householder
Approved
2010-08-20
10/00574/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-08-17
100268
Full Planning
Approved
2010-06-16
TP/09/1833
Full
Refused
2010-06-04
0243/10
Householder
Refused
2010-05-21
10/00079/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2010-04-01
091206
Full Planning
Approved
2010-01-06
091279
Full Planning
Refused
2009-12-09
091455
Full Planning
Approved
2009-12-09
2009/3098
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2009-10-29
1950/09
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-10-16
09/01268/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-10-09
090329
Full Planning
Approved
2009-10-05
090711
Full Planning
Refused
2009-07-22
PA/09/00267
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-07-06
1028/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-06-30
09/00456/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2009-06-01
090263
Full Planning
Approved
2009-05-29
090301
Full Planning
Refused
2009-05-28
09/0582/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-05-11
09/0583/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2009-05-11
090800
Full Planning
Approved
2009-05-08
0333/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-09
090907
Full Planning
Refused
2009-03-23
0340/09
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-03-18
090438
Full Planning
Approved
2009-03-03
08/01672/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-02-06
2878/08
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-12-15
PA/08/02155/R
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-12-01
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmK B Kumar
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage17 London boroughs
Years active17 (2004–20)
Applications183
Approval rate66%
London avg79%
London rank951st of 51,699
Related investigations
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
How every consultancy ranks →
Approval rate and scheme mix across London consultancies — the full track record.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 2004–20. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
  2. [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
  3. [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.