Planning consultancy · London
Peter Causer.
A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 79% of applications — close to the London average of 79% — across 98 applications in 7 boroughs, 2006–20.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.
Planning consultancy15 years active7 boroughs79% approval2239th in London
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →98
Applications
London 2006–20
—
Appeal success
fewer than 5 appeals on record for this firm
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 82 decided applications
Why a consultant? Listed as a consultant because every application we hold for them names them as the agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your firm?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
What they submit — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]
The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data
How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this firm's applications concentrate, 2006–20.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
171744FUL
Full Application
Approved
2017-05-31
PP/2014/1285
Full Application
Refused
2015-08-14
PP/2015/1030
Full Application
Approved
2015-04-20
2013/03660/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-10-24
2013/00514/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Withdrawn
2013-08-23
PP/2012/0699
Full Application
Approved
2013-05-01
PP/2013/0183
Full Application
Approved
2013-03-13
2012/03368/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2012-12-12
2011/03743/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2012-01-19
Show all 60 rows
171744FUL
Full Application
Approved
2017-05-31
PP/2014/1285
Full Application
Refused
2015-08-14
PP/2015/1030
Full Application
Approved
2015-04-20
2013/03660/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-10-24
2013/00514/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Withdrawn
2013-08-23
PP/2012/0699
Full Application
Approved
2013-05-01
PP/2013/0183
Full Application
Approved
2013-03-13
2012/03368/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2012-12-12
2011/03743/FUL
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2012-01-19
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmPeter Causer
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage7 London boroughs
Years active15 (2006–20)
Applications98
Approval rate79%
London avg79%
London rank2239th of 46,134
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 2006–20. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
- [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
- [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.