Roger Hewlett.
A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 40% of applications — below the London average of 79% — across 6 applications in 1 borough, 2015–16.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
No named case officers on this firm’s applications.
Where this firm's applications concentrate, 2015–16.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.
No repeat company developers identified on this firm's applications.
- [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 2015–16. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
- [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
- [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology