Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonCrystal Palace And Upper Norwood ward19/02093/FUL
Planning application · Croydon

19/02093/FUL.

Land And Parking Adjoining 2 The Lawns Upper Norwood London SE19 3TS

Full planning permission at Land And Parking Adjoining 2 The Lawns Upper Norwood London SE19 3TS, received 7 May 2019 — permission refused on 13 Jul 2021 (delegated, James Udall).

No verified coordinate is held for this application, so no site map is drawn.
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Permission Refused
Outcome
13 Jul 2021
114 wks
Decision time
106 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
0
Documents
on the council file
Objections
not captured
Yes
Appeal
Dismissed appeal
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of 4 no. 3-bed two storey houses, with associated parking (amended description)

Reference
19/02093/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
7 May 2019
Validated
7 May 2019
Decision date
13 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Reference
19/02093/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 13 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Council
Received
7 May 2019
Validated
7 May 2019
Decision date
13 Jul 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Documents

What was filed?

No documents are recorded for this application.

Documents open on the Croydon portal. View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Permission Refused on 13 Jul 2021, delegated decision by James Udall — 114 weeks from submission (106 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
7 May 2019
Application received
7 May 2019
Application validated
13 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Permission Refused · James Udall
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal
7 May 2019
Application received
7 May 2019
Application validated
13 Jul 2021
Delegated decision: Permission Refused · James Udall
Show all 4 rows
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal

Public response

Comment counts were not captured for this application.

People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent as stated on the application
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.