Planning application · Croydon
20/00997/FUL.
Addington Palace Gravel Hill Croydon CR0 5BB
Full / Other Planning at Addington Palace Gravel Hill Croydon CR0 5BB, received 2 Mar 2020 — refused on 16 Oct 2020 (delegated, Violet Dixon).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
16 Oct 2020
33 wks
Decision time
25 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
14
Documents
14 linked
11
Objections
0 in support
Yes
Appeal
Dismissed appeal
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Retrospective application for the erection of entrance gates and post and chain perimeter fencing, association alterations
Reference
20/00997/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Mar 2020
Validated
3 Mar 2020
Target date
28 Apr 2020
Decision date
16 Oct 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
20/00997/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
Council
Received
2 Mar 2020
Validated
3 Mar 2020
Target date
28 Apr 2020
Decision date
16 Oct 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 16 Oct 2020, delegated decision by Violet Dixon — 33 weeks from submission (25 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
2 Mar 2020
Application received
3 Mar 2020
Application validated
28 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
16 Oct 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Violet Dixon
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal
2 Mar 2020
Application received
3 Mar 2020
Application validated
28 Apr 2020
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
16 Oct 2020
Delegated decision: Refused · Violet Dixon
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The entrance gates, posts and chain perimeter fencing would harm the open
character of the Metropolitan Green Belt, and no very special circumstances
have been demonstrated to outweigh the harm that would be caused. The
proposal therefore conflicts with Chapter 13 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2019), Policies SP7 and DM26 of the Croydon Local Plan
(2018) and Policy 7.16 of the London Plan 2016 (consolidated with
amendments since 2011).
2
The entrance gates, posts and chain perimeter fencing would cause harm to
the listed building and its setting and would not preserve or enhance the
character or appearance of the Addington Village Conservation Area, by
reason of location and design and would thereby conflicts with Chapter 16 of
the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policies SP4, DM10 and
DM18 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018), Policies 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the
London Plan 2016 (consolidated with alterations since 2011) and the
Addington Village Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
(2020).
1
The entrance gates, posts and chain perimeter fencing would harm the open
character of the Metropolitan Green Belt, and no very special circumstances
have been demonstrated to outweigh the harm that would be caused. The
proposal therefore conflicts with Chapter 13 of the National Planning Policy
Framework (2019), Policies SP7 and DM26 of the Croydon Local Plan
(2018) and Policy 7.16 of the London Plan 2016 (consolidated with
amendments since 2011).
2
The entrance gates, posts and chain perimeter fencing would cause harm to
the listed building and its setting and would not preserve or enhance the
character or appearance of the Addington Village Conservation Area, by
reason of location and design and would thereby conflicts with Chapter 16 of
the National Planning Policy Framework (2019), Policies SP4, DM10 and
DM18 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018), Policies 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 and 7.8 of the
London Plan 2016 (consolidated with alterations since 2011) and the
Addington Village Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
(2020).
Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 13SP7DM26London Plan 7.16NPPFNational Planning Policy Framework 16SP4DM10DM18London Plan 7.4London Plan 7.5London Plan 7.6London Plan 7.8
Appeal
Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
11
In support
0
Total comments
11
Objections
11
In support
0
Total comments
11
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.