Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonSelsdon Vale And Forestdale ward20/01761/FUL
Planning application · Croydon

20/01761/FUL.

226 Addington Road South Croydon CR2 8LD

Full / Other Planning at 226 Addington Road South Croydon CR2 8LD, received 22 Apr 2020 — refused on 12 Aug 2020 by committee.

CroydonSelsdon Vale And ForestdaleCR2 8LD20/01761/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
12 Aug 2020
16 wks
Decision time
8 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
21
Documents
21 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Erection of extensions to rear of the existing building to provide a 2 bedroom dwelling with private amenity courtyard and additional refuse and cycle provision.

Reference
20/01761/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 8LD
Council
Received
22 Apr 2020
Target date
17 Jun 2020
Decision date
12 Aug 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
20/01761/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 8LD
Council
Received
22 Apr 2020
Target date
17 Jun 2020
Decision date
12 Aug 2020
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
12 Aug 2020
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
12 Aug 2020
OFFICERS REPORT FOR COMMITTEE
28 Jul 2020
1460-PL1210 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1460-PL1211 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1460-PL1310 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1461-PL1311 REV A
15 Jun 2020
SITE NOTICE NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION
29 Apr 2020
SITE LOCATION PLAN
22 Apr 2020
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
22 Apr 2020
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
12 Aug 2020
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
12 Aug 2020
OFFICERS REPORT FOR COMMITTEE
28 Jul 2020
Show all 10 rows
1460-PL1210 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1460-PL1211 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1460-PL1310 REV A
15 Jun 2020
1461-PL1311 REV A
15 Jun 2020
SITE NOTICE NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION
29 Apr 2020
SITE LOCATION PLAN
22 Apr 2020
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN
22 Apr 2020

Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 12 Aug 2020, determined by the planning committee — 16 weeks from submission (8 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
22 Apr 2020
Application received
17 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2020
Committee decision: Refused
22 Apr 2020
Application received
17 Jun 2020
Statutory target date
12 Aug 2020
Committee decision: Refused

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development would provide poor level of accommodation by reason of poor layout, poor outlook, poor amenity space and the fear of crime for future occupiers and would exacerbate safety concerns and would thereby conflict with Policies SP2.6, SP2.7, SP2.8, SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policies 3.5 and 7.1 of the London Plan (consolidated with alterations since 2011), the DCLG Technical Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standard (March 2015), the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019).
2
The development would be detrimental to the amenities of the occupiers of the host and adjoining property by reason of visual intrusion and poor outlook and would thereby conflict with Policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 and 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan (consolidated with alterations since 2011) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019) In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. In this instance the pre application advice was not adhered to.
1
The development would provide poor level of accommodation by reason of poor layout, poor outlook, poor amenity space and the fear of crime for future occupiers and would exacerbate safety concerns and would thereby conflict with Policies SP2.6, SP2.7, SP2.8, SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Policies 3.5 and 7.1 of the London Plan (consolidated with alterations since 2011), the DCLG Technical Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standard (March 2015), the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019).
2
The development would be detrimental to the amenities of the occupiers of the host and adjoining property by reason of visual intrusion and poor outlook and would thereby conflict with Policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 and 7.4 and 7.6 of the London Plan (consolidated with alterations since 2011) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (April 2019) In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. In this instance the pre application advice was not adhered to.
Policies cited
SP2.6SP2.7SP2.8SP4DM10London Plan 3.5London Plan 7.1London Plan 7.4London Plan 7.6

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.