Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonCoulsdon Town ward20/05370/FUL
Planning application · Croydon

20/05370/FUL.

5 Smitham Downs Road Purley CR8 4NH

Full / Other Planning at 5 Smitham Downs Road Purley CR8 4NH, received 9 Oct 2020 — refused on 1 Sep 2021 by committee.

CroydonCoulsdon TownCR8 4NH20/05370/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
1 Sep 2021
47 wks
Decision time
39 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
48
Documents
48 linked
324
Objections
3 in support
Yes
Appeal
Dismissed appeal
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Demolition of existing dwelling, the construction of a part 4 / part 5 storey residential building accommodating 20 flats, all together with vehicular accesses from Smitham Downs Road and The Vale, vehicle and cycle parking, refuse provision and associated hard and soft landscaping (amended description).

Reference
20/05370/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR8 4NH
Council
Received
9 Oct 2020
Validated
16 Oct 2020
Target date
15 Jan 2021
Decision date
1 Sep 2021
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Reference
20/05370/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR8 4NH
Council
Received
9 Oct 2020
Validated
16 Oct 2020
Target date
15 Jan 2021
Decision date
1 Sep 2021
Decision route
Planning committee
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
APPEAL DECISION
17 Aug 2022
LPA STATEMENT OF CASE
7 Apr 2022
STATEMENT-GROUNDS OF APPEAL
2 Nov 2021
ZONES BY APARTMENT UNITS-
2 Nov 2021
SECOND FLOOR GA PLAN PROPOSED-
2 Nov 2021
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
1 Sept 2021
0105 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0104 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0103 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0102 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
APPEAL DECISION
17 Aug 2022
LPA STATEMENT OF CASE
7 Apr 2022
STATEMENT-GROUNDS OF APPEAL
2 Nov 2021
Show all 10 rows
ZONES BY APARTMENT UNITS-
2 Nov 2021
SECOND FLOOR GA PLAN PROPOSED-
2 Nov 2021
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
1 Sept 2021
0105 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0104 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0103 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021
0102 REV C - SUBMITTED 14/07/21
14 Jul 2021

Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 1 Sep 2021, determined by the planning committee — 47 weeks from submission (39 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Oct 2020
Application received
16 Oct 2020
Application validated
15 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
1 Sep 2021
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal
9 Oct 2020
Application received
16 Oct 2020
Application validated
15 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 5 rows
1 Sep 2021
Committee decision: Refused
Appeal
Appeal decided · Dismissed appeal

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development by reason of its height, size and massing creates an overdevelopment of the site that would be out of keeping with the character of the area and would thereby conflict with Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies SP4.1, SP4.2 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2019).
2
The development would provide sub-standard accommodation by reason of inadequate outdoor space for future occupiers and detrimentally impact lighting conditions of the neighbouring building and would thereby conflict with Policies SP2.8, SP4.2 and DM10.6 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018), Policies D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (2019) In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process.
1
The development by reason of its height, size and massing creates an overdevelopment of the site that would be out of keeping with the character of the area and would thereby conflict with Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021), policies SP4.1, SP4.2 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018) and the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2019).
2
The development would provide sub-standard accommodation by reason of inadequate outdoor space for future occupiers and detrimentally impact lighting conditions of the neighbouring building and would thereby conflict with Policies SP2.8, SP4.2 and DM10.6 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018), Policies D3, D4 and D6 of the London Plan (2021), the Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance to the London Plan (March 2016) and the Suburban Design Guide - Supplementary Planning Document (2019) In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process.
Policies cited
D3D4SP4.1SP4.2DM10SP2.8DM10.6D6

Appeal

Appeal
Outcome
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Dismissed appeal

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
324
In support
3
Total comments
327
Objections
324
In support
3
Total comments
327
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Determined at committee
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer (report to committee)
Show all 4 rows
Determined at committee
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.