Planning application · Croydon
20/05926/LP.
Lawful Development Certificate at 89 Mead Way Coulsdon CR5 1PQ, received 15 Nov 2020 — approved on 11 Dec 2020 (delegated, Joshua Swaby).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Approved
Outcome
11 Dec 2020
4 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Alterations, erection of a single storey rear extension
Reference
20/05926/LP
Type
LDC (Proposed) Operations edged
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
15 Nov 2020
Validated
16 Nov 2020
Target date
11 Jan 2021
Decision date
11 Dec 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Reference
20/05926/LP
Type
LDC (Proposed) Operations edged
Show all 17 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
None recorded
Case officer
Postcode
Ward
Council
Received
15 Nov 2020
Validated
16 Nov 2020
Target date
11 Jan 2021
Decision date
11 Dec 2020
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Premises record
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 9 rows
Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Approved on 11 Dec 2020, delegated decision by Joshua Swaby — 4 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
15 Nov 2020
Application received
16 Nov 2020
Application validated
11 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
11 Dec 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Joshua Swaby
15 Nov 2020
Application received
16 Nov 2020
Application validated
11 Jan 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
11 Dec 2020
Delegated decision: Approved · Joshua Swaby
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
No agent recorded
Applied without an agent, or agent not recorded.
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.