Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonWaddon ward21/00606/FUL
Planning application · Croydon

21/00606/FUL.

Whitgift School Haling Park South Croydon CR2 6YT

Full / Other Planning at Whitgift School Haling Park South Croydon CR2 6YT, received 9 Feb 2021 — refused on 27 Sep 2021 (delegated, Kieran Gilmore).

CroydonWaddonCR2 6YT21/00606/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Sep 2021
33 wks
Decision time
25 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
29
Documents
29 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Retention of 4 Portakabin classroom buildings (8nr classrooms) on existing car park and the installation of a temporary car park for 3 years.

Reference
21/00606/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 6YT
Ward
Council
Received
9 Feb 2021
Validated
19 Mar 2021
Target date
14 May 2021
Decision date
27 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/00606/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 6YT
Ward
Council
Received
9 Feb 2021
Validated
19 Mar 2021
Target date
14 May 2021
Decision date
27 Sep 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
SITE LOCATION PLAN
29 Mar 2022
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
27 Sept 2021
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
27 Sept 2021
AFFECTING THE SETTING OF LISTED BUILDING
24 Mar 2021
PLANNING STATEMENT
20 Mar 2021
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE REPORT - LISTED BUILDINGS / LOCALLY LISTED BUILDING
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE REPORT - ARCHAEOLOGY
20 Mar 2021
SITE LOCATION PLAN
29 Mar 2022
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
27 Sept 2021
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
27 Sept 2021
Show all 10 rows
AFFECTING THE SETTING OF LISTED BUILDING
24 Mar 2021
PLANNING STATEMENT
20 Mar 2021
ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE REPORT - LISTED BUILDINGS / LOCALLY LISTED BUILDING
20 Mar 2021
HERITAGE REPORT - ARCHAEOLOGY
20 Mar 2021

Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Sep 2021, delegated decision by Kieran Gilmore — 33 weeks from submission (25 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
9 Feb 2021
Application received
19 Mar 2021
Application validated
14 May 2021
Statutory target date
27 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kieran Gilmore
9 Feb 2021
Application received
19 Mar 2021
Application validated
14 May 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Sep 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Kieran Gilmore

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The siting of the modular classrooms and provision of temporary car parking area could have a detrimental effect on the setting of a Listed Building, and setting of a Locally Listed Building, and could have a detrimental effect on the retention of a green landscape and trees and would thereby conflict with Policies HC1, G1, G5, and G7 of the London Plan 2021 and Policies SP4.1, SP4.2, SP4.12, SP4.13, DM10.8, DM18.1, DM18.2, DM18.3, DM18.5, SP7.1, SP7.5 and DM28 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018.
2
The development could be detrimental to highway safety and sustainable travel choice through the access to, and provision and extent of the temporary car parking area and would thereby conflict with Policies T1, T4, T5, and T7 of the London Plan 2021, and Policies SP8.1, SP8.3, SP8.6, SP8.7, SP8.13, SP8.15, DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions for the specified development were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process.
1
The siting of the modular classrooms and provision of temporary car parking area could have a detrimental effect on the setting of a Listed Building, and setting of a Locally Listed Building, and could have a detrimental effect on the retention of a green landscape and trees and would thereby conflict with Policies HC1, G1, G5, and G7 of the London Plan 2021 and Policies SP4.1, SP4.2, SP4.12, SP4.13, DM10.8, DM18.1, DM18.2, DM18.3, DM18.5, SP7.1, SP7.5 and DM28 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018.
2
The development could be detrimental to highway safety and sustainable travel choice through the access to, and provision and extent of the temporary car parking area and would thereby conflict with Policies T1, T4, T5, and T7 of the London Plan 2021, and Policies SP8.1, SP8.3, SP8.6, SP8.7, SP8.13, SP8.15, DM29 and DM30 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions for the specified development were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process.
Policies cited
G7SP4.1SP4.2SP4.12SP4.13DM10.8DM18.1DM18.2DM18.3DM18.5SP7.1SP7.5DM28T7SP8.1SP8.3SP8.6SP8.7SP8.13SP8.15DM29DM30

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.