Planning application · Croydon
21/03312/HSE.
3 Woodland Way Croydon CR0 7UB
Householder at 3 Woodland Way Croydon CR0 7UB, received 21 Jun 2021 — refused on 17 Aug 2021 (delegated, Grace Hewett).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Aug 2021
8 wks
Decision time
inside the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
1
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Alterations, erection of hip to gable extensions, enlargement of existing rear dormer extension, erection of two-storey front extension and installation of 2 rooflights in front roofslope.
Reference
21/03312/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 7UB
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2021
Validated
22 Jun 2021
Target date
17 Aug 2021
Decision date
17 Aug 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/03312/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 7UB
Ward
Council
Received
21 Jun 2021
Validated
22 Jun 2021
Target date
17 Aug 2021
Decision date
17 Aug 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Aug 2021, delegated decision by Grace Hewett — 8 weeks from submission.
Timeline
Date
Event
21 Jun 2021
Application received
22 Jun 2021
Application validated
17 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
17 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace Hewett
21 Jun 2021
Application received
22 Jun 2021
Application validated
17 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
17 Aug 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Grace Hewett
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed hip to gable extensions, rear dormer extension and two-storey
front extensions by virtue of its size and design would not respect or
positively respond to the character of the host dwelling, and would be
detrimental to the character of the host dwelling and street scene. As such, it
would be contrary to policies SP4 and DM10 of The Croydon Local Plan
(2018), the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
(2019) and policy D3 of the London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written
guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning
Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local
Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
1
The proposed hip to gable extensions, rear dormer extension and two-storey
front extensions by virtue of its size and design would not respect or
positively respond to the character of the host dwelling, and would be
detrimental to the character of the host dwelling and street scene. As such, it
would be contrary to policies SP4 and DM10 of The Croydon Local Plan
(2018), the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document
(2019) and policy D3 of the London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written
guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning
Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local
Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
Policies cited
SP4DM10D3
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.