Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonAddiscombe East ward21/03410/FUL
Planning application · Croydon

21/03410/FUL.

54 Elgin Road Croydon CR0 6XA

Full / Other Planning at 54 Elgin Road Croydon CR0 6XA, received 25 Jun 2021 — refused on 23 Nov 2021 (delegated, Christopher Grace).

CroydonAddiscombe EastCR0 6XA21/03410/FUL
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
23 Nov 2021
22 wks
Decision time
14 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
9
Documents
9 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of a single storey rear extension and two storey side extension.

Reference
21/03410/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 6XA
Council
Received
25 Jun 2021
Target date
20 Aug 2021
Decision date
23 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
21/03410/FUL
Type
Full planning permission
Show all 15 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 6XA
Council
Received
25 Jun 2021
Target date
20 Aug 2021
Decision date
23 Nov 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
23 Nov 2021
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
23 Nov 2021
CHARACTER/APPEARANCE CONSERVATION AREA
28 Jul 2021
SITE LOCATION PLAN
25 Jun 2021
SITE PLAN
25 Jun 2021
EXISTING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
25 Jun 2021
PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
25 Jun 2021
PLANNING STATEMENT
25 Jun 2021
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
25 Jun 2021
REFUSED (PR) FULL - DEC NOTICE
23 Nov 2021
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
23 Nov 2021
CHARACTER/APPEARANCE CONSERVATION AREA
28 Jul 2021
Show all 9 rows
SITE LOCATION PLAN
25 Jun 2021
SITE PLAN
25 Jun 2021
EXISTING PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
25 Jun 2021
PROPOSED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS
25 Jun 2021
PLANNING STATEMENT
25 Jun 2021
APPLICATION FORM - WITHOUT PERSONAL DATA
25 Jun 2021

Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 23 Nov 2021, delegated decision by Christopher Grace — 22 weeks from submission (14 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
25 Jun 2021
Application received
20 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
23 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Christopher Grace
25 Jun 2021
Application received
20 Aug 2021
Statutory target date
23 Nov 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Christopher Grace

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed development, by reason of its poor design, scale, massing and appearance would have a harmful impact on the visual amenity of the area, a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, would preserve neither the character nor appearance of the East India Conservation Area and would be in conflict with Policies SP2 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan and Policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan 2021 and the Councils Supplementary Planning Document Suburban Design Guide (SDG) 2019.
2
Officers remain unconvinced that sufficient detail has been provided to demonstrate that the proposal by reason of its massing, form and appearance would not have a detrimental impact on the outlook for neighbours at 50 and 56 Elgin Road contrary to policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 and the Councils Supplementary Planning Document Suburban Design Guide (SDG) 2019. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way:
3
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
1
The proposed development, by reason of its poor design, scale, massing and appearance would have a harmful impact on the visual amenity of the area, a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, would preserve neither the character nor appearance of the East India Conservation Area and would be in conflict with Policies SP2 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan and Policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan 2021 and the Councils Supplementary Planning Document Suburban Design Guide (SDG) 2019.
2
Officers remain unconvinced that sufficient detail has been provided to demonstrate that the proposal by reason of its massing, form and appearance would not have a detrimental impact on the outlook for neighbours at 50 and 56 Elgin Road contrary to policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 and the Councils Supplementary Planning Document Suburban Design Guide (SDG) 2019. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way:
3
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
Policies cited
SP2DM10D4HC1

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
5
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
5
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.