Planning application · Croydon
21/03959/HSE.
34 Featherbed Lane Croydon CR0 9AE
Householder at 34 Featherbed Lane Croydon CR0 9AE, received 27 Jul 2021 — refused on 8 Oct 2021 (delegated, Richard Freeman).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
8 Oct 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
12
Documents
12 linked
0
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Alterations, erection of a two storey side and single storey rear wrap-around extension
Reference
21/03959/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 9AE
Council
Received
27 Jul 2021
Validated
28 Jul 2021
Target date
22 Sep 2021
Decision date
8 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/03959/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR0 9AE
Council
Received
27 Jul 2021
Validated
28 Jul 2021
Target date
22 Sep 2021
Decision date
8 Oct 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 8 Oct 2021, delegated decision by Richard Freeman — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
27 Jul 2021
Application received
28 Jul 2021
Application validated
22 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
8 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Freeman
27 Jul 2021
Application received
28 Jul 2021
Application validated
22 Sep 2021
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
8 Oct 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Richard Freeman
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The design and appearance of the first floor extension would be
unsympathetic to the character of the area and appearance of the existing
house contrary to policies SP4.1 and DM10 of The Croydon Local Plan
2018, the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2019
and policy D3 of the London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
2
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and
written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning
Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local
Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
1
The design and appearance of the first floor extension would be
unsympathetic to the character of the area and appearance of the existing
house contrary to policies SP4.1 and DM10 of The Croydon Local Plan
2018, the Suburban Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2019
and policy D3 of the London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
2
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and
written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning
Authority's suggested improvements were not adopted by the applicant. The Local
Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
Policies cited
SP4.1DM10D3
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.