Planning application · Croydon
21/05173/HSE.
87 Fairdene Road Coulsdon CR5 1RJ
Householder at 87 Fairdene Road Coulsdon CR5 1RJ, received 11 Oct 2021 — refused on 17 Dec 2021 (delegated, Joe Sales).
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
17 Dec 2021
10 wks
Decision time
2 wks over the 8-week target
—
Conditions
not captured
10
Documents
10 linked
15
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application
What is it?
Demolition of the existing garage; erection of a two storey side extension; erection of a single storey rear extension; erection of an outbuilding; erection of a new porch; amendments to front boundary wall.
Reference
21/05173/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR5 1RJ
Ward
Council
Received
11 Oct 2021
Target date
6 Dec 2021
Decision date
17 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Reference
21/05173/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 15 rows
Applicant
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR5 1RJ
Ward
Council
Received
11 Oct 2021
Target date
6 Dec 2021
Decision date
17 Dec 2021
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Council register
Documents
What was filed?
Document
Published
View
Show all 10 rows
Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗
Decision
What happened?
Refused on 17 Dec 2021, delegated decision by Joe Sales — 10 weeks from submission (2 over the 8-week target).
Timeline
Date
Event
11 Oct 2021
Application received
6 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
17 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Joe Sales
11 Oct 2021
Application received
6 Dec 2021
Statutory target date
17 Dec 2021
Delegated decision: Refused · Joe Sales
Why it was refused
Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The development would detract from the character and appearance of the
dwelling and would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the street scene
by reason of scale, massing and design and would thereby conflict with
Policy SP4.1 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Supplementary
Planning Document Suburban Design Guide Chapter 4 on Residential
Extensions and Alterations and Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The proposal fails to address fire safety or demonstrate that the highest
standards of fire safety would be achieved, contrary to Policy D12 of the
London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written
guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process.
1
The development would detract from the character and appearance of the
dwelling and would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the street scene
by reason of scale, massing and design and would thereby conflict with
Policy SP4.1 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018, Supplementary
Planning Document Suburban Design Guide Chapter 4 on Residential
Extensions and Alterations and Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021.
2
The proposal fails to address fire safety or demonstrate that the highest
standards of fire safety would be achieved, contrary to Policy D12 of the
London Plan (2021).
In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a
positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the
following way:
To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written
guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre
planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance
and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter
into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning
application via the Council's Pre Application process.
Policies cited
SP4.1DM10D4D12
Public response
Measure
Count
Objections
15
In support
0
Total comments
16
Objections
15
In support
0
Total comments
16
People
Who is involved?
Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place
What affects it?
Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.
Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)
No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.