Planning Atlas
Planning AtlasCroydonSouth Croydon ward25/03854/HSE
Planning application · Croydon

25/03854/HSE.

20 Newark Road South Croydon CR2 6HQ

Householder at 20 Newark Road South Croydon CR2 6HQ, received 1 Dec 2025 — refused on 27 Apr 2026 (delegated, Fiza Meeraj).

CroydonSouth CroydonCR2 6HQ25/03854/HSE
ApprovedRefusedOther
At a glance · this applicationCroydon profile →
Refused
Outcome
27 Apr 2026
21 wks
Decision time
13 wks over the 8-week target
Conditions
not captured
29
Documents
29 linked
3
Objections
0 in support
No
Appeal
none recorded
Record from the Croydon planning register as captured; documents link to the council's own files. Nearby applications are context, not part of this application.
Application

What is it?

Construction of part single-storey and part first-floor rear extensions, together with a loft conversion including a rear dormer and rooflights to the front roof slope

Reference
25/03854/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 6HQ
Council
Received
1 Dec 2025
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Target date
29 Apr 2026
Decision date
27 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Reference
25/03854/HSE
Type
Householder Application
Show all 16 rows
Agent / consultant
Case officer
Postcode
CR2 6HQ
Council
Received
1 Dec 2025
Validated
4 Mar 2026
Target date
29 Apr 2026
Decision date
27 Apr 2026
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
Status
Decided
Documents

What was filed?

Document
Published
View
REFUSED (PR) HOUSEHOLDER - DEC NOTICE
27 Apr 2026
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
27 Apr 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REFUSED (PR) HOUSEHOLDER - DEC NOTICE
27 Apr 2026
OFFICER REPORT WEB - FINAL
27 Apr 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
Show all 10 rows
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026
REVISED
11 Mar 2026

Documents open on the Croydon portal (the portal needs its documents tab opened first — the link handles that). View the application page ↗

Decision

What happened?

Refused on 27 Apr 2026, delegated decision by Fiza Meeraj — 21 weeks from submission (13 over the 8-week target).

Timeline

Date
Event
1 Dec 2025
Application received
4 Mar 2026
Application validated
29 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
27 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiza Meeraj
1 Dec 2025
Application received
4 Mar 2026
Application validated
29 Apr 2026
Statutory target date
Show all 4 rows
27 Apr 2026
Delegated decision: Refused · Fiza Meeraj

Why it was refused

Reason
As stated on the decision notice
1
The proposed proposals, by reason of their size, bulk, massing and design, would result in a visually bulky and incongruous addition that fails to respect the character of the original property and the established pattern of development within the street. The development would disrupt the cohesive architectural character of the host dwelling and surrounding area, contrary to Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018).
2
The proposed first floor extension and dormer, would result in an overbearing and visually intrusive form when viewed from neighbouring property and would give rise to an increased sense of enclosure and loss of outlook and light to no.22, resulting in unacceptable harm to residential amenity contrary to Policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018). In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
1
The proposed proposals, by reason of their size, bulk, massing and design, would result in a visually bulky and incongruous addition that fails to respect the character of the original property and the established pattern of development within the street. The development would disrupt the cohesive architectural character of the host dwelling and surrounding area, contrary to Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018).
2
The proposed first floor extension and dormer, would result in an overbearing and visually intrusive form when viewed from neighbouring property and would give rise to an increased sense of enclosure and loss of outlook and light to no.22, resulting in unacceptable harm to residential amenity contrary to Policies D3 and D6 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (2018). In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has sought to work in a positive and pro-active manner based on seeking solutions to problems in the following way: To assist applicants the Local Planning Authority has produced policies and written guidance, all of which is available on the Council's website and offers a pre planning application advice service. The scheme does not comply with guidance and no pre application discussions were entered into. The Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants to assist in the preparation of a new planning application via the Council's Pre Application process. The Local Planning Authority delivered the decision in a timely manner.
Policies cited
D3D4SP4DM10D6

Public response

Measure
Count
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
Objections
3
In support
0
Total comments
3
People

Who is involved?

Name
Role
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Applicant — the party who applied, not necessarily the owner
Agent · consultant profile
Case officer — delegated decision
Place

What affects it?

Context around the site — not part of this application. Designations over the site: use the map's designations filter (conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4, flood risk …). Decisions within 250 metres of the site are listed below — context, not this application.

Other applications within 250 metres (context — nearby, not this application)

No other geocoded decision is recorded within 250 metres.