Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersAbbey Developments Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersAbbey Developments Ltd
Developer · London

Abbey Developments Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 8 applications in 4 boroughs, seeking 1,526 residential units, at a 100% approval rate, 2004–26.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer1,526 units sought4 boroughs100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
8
Applications
London 2004–26
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (8) and agent (6); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
90%95%100%’04’05’10’14’15’16’17’18’19’20’24’25’26
What they build — by scheme type
37decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
11
100%
7
100%
Show all 4 rows
2
100%

Where this developer builds, 2004–26.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-06-17
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-25
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-21
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-21
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2024-12-03
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-06-08
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-03-12
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-02-24
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-05-24
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Other
2019-03-26
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Other
2019-03-26
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-02-27
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-01-11
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2018-02-02
Bexley
Reserved Matters following Major Outline
Approved
2017-09-12
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-08-07
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-06-15
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2016-11-24
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-11-10
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-08-25
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-31
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-10-14
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-03-09
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-02-19
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-11-26
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2014-10-16
Barking And Dagenham
Non-Material Amendment following Grant of Planning Permission
Other
2014-07-14
Barking And Dagenham
Approval of Reserved Matters
Approved
2014-02-11
Enfield
Full
Approved
2010-12-21
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2005-12-21
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-03-21
Enfield
Full
Approved
2004-11-16
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-06-17
Show all 38 rows
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-25
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-21
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2025-03-21
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2024-12-03
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-06-08
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-03-12
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2020-02-24
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-05-24
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Other
2019-03-26
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Other
2019-03-26
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-02-27
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2019-01-11
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2018-02-02
Bexley
Reserved Matters following Major Outline
Approved
2017-09-12
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-08-07
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-06-15
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2016-11-24
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-11-10
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-08-25
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-12-31
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-10-14
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-03-09
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2015-02-19
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-11-26
Barking And Dagenham
Application for Approval of Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2014-10-16
Barking And Dagenham
Non-Material Amendment following Grant of Planning Permission
Other
2014-07-14
Barking And Dagenham
Approval of Reserved Matters
Approved
2014-02-11
Enfield
Full
Approved
2010-12-21
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2005-12-21
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-03-21
Enfield
Full
Approved
2004-11-16
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperAbbey Developments Ltd
Coverage4 London boroughs
Applications8 (2004–26)
Units sought1,526
Approval rate100%
London rank#239 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.