Developer · London
Anchor Trust.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 60 applications in 16 boroughs, seeking 195 residential units, at a 92% approval rate, 1996–19.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer195 units sought16 boroughs92% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →60
Applications
London 1996–19
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because they appear as the applicant on 60 applications and as the agent on only 5.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 16 rows
Where this developer builds, 1996–19.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Redbridge
Works to TPO Tree(s)
Refused
2015-09-16
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
No objection
2015-05-18
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2014-12-15
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-08-28
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
No objection
2014-07-17
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2014-07-07
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
Objection
2014-07-07
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2014-07-01
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2013-07-10
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2013-02-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2013-01-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Works to Trees Under TPO
Approved
2012-09-11
Richmond Upon Thames
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
No objection
2012-09-11
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2012-08-08
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2011-06-09
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
No objection
2011-03-01
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-12-17
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2010-01-27
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
Approved
2009-10-02
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2009-06-22
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2009-03-10
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
Withdrawn
2009-03-06
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2008-11-06
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2007-10-06
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-08-02
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2007-04-24
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-10-10
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-02-07
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2005-04-20
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2005-02-07
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2004-07-02
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2004-03-26
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-08-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-20
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-12-09
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-12-04
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-11-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-11-22
Show all 60 rows
Redbridge
Works to TPO Tree(s)
Refused
2015-09-16
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
No objection
2015-05-18
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2014-12-15
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-08-28
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
No objection
2014-07-17
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2014-07-07
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
Objection
2014-07-07
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2014-07-01
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2013-07-10
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2013-02-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2013-01-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Works to Trees Under TPO
Approved
2012-09-11
Richmond Upon Thames
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
No objection
2012-09-11
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2012-08-08
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2011-06-09
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
No objection
2011-03-01
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-12-17
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2010-01-27
Greenwich
Tree works in a Conservation Area
Approved
2009-10-02
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2009-06-22
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2009-03-10
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
Withdrawn
2009-03-06
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2008-11-06
Redbridge
Works to Trees in Con. Area
No objection
2007-10-06
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-08-02
Enfield
Works to a tree with a TPO
Approved
2007-04-24
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-10-10
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-02-07
Wandsworth
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Approved
2005-04-20
Tower Hamlets
Approval of Details -Discharge Condition
Approved
2005-02-07
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2004-07-02
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2004-03-26
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-08-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-20
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-06-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-12-09
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-12-04
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-11-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2002-11-22
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperAnchor Trust
Coverage16 London boroughs
Applications60 (1996–19)
Units sought195
Approval rate92%
London rank#811 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.