Developer · London
Antler Homes.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 19 applications in 7 boroughs, seeking 39 residential units, at a 56% approval rate, 2000–14.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer39 units sought7 boroughs56% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →19
Applications
London 2000–14
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this developer builds, 2000–14.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2014-11-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2014-08-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Refused
2014-06-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2013-10-23
Hounslow
Details pursuant to a planning condition
Approved
2003-08-13
Wandsworth
Reserved Matters (following outline)
Approved
2002-11-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
No determination
2002-11-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2002-09-10
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2002-09-10
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2000-11-02
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2014-11-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2014-08-04
Show all 26 rows
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Refused
2014-06-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Removal or variation of a condition
Approved
2013-10-23
Hounslow
Details pursuant to a planning condition
Approved
2003-08-13
Wandsworth
Reserved Matters (following outline)
Approved
2002-11-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
No determination
2002-11-12
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2002-09-10
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2002-09-10
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2000-11-02
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperAntler Homes
Coverage7 London boroughs
Applications19 (2000–14)
Units sought39
Approval rate56%
London rank#1760 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.