Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersBelleview Plc
Planning AtlasDevelopersBelleview PLC
Developer · London

Belleview PLC.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 7 applications in 4 boroughs, at a 80% approval rate, 1996–00.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer4 boroughs80% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
7
Applications
London 1996–00
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’96’98’99’00
What they build — by scheme type
7decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
5
100%
2
100%
Show all 4 rows

Where this developer builds, 1996–00.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Westminster
Advert Application (ADV)
Refused
2000-03-03
Westminster
Listed Building Consent Application
Refused
2000-03-03
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-22
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1999-03-02
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-10-20
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1998-09-04
Islington
Listed Building
Approved
1998-01-22
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1996-10-24
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
1996-10-24
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Split
1996-10-24
Westminster
Advert Application (ADV)
Refused
2000-03-03
Westminster
Listed Building Consent Application
Refused
2000-03-03
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-04-22
Show all 10 rows
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1999-03-02
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-10-20
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1998-09-04
Islington
Listed Building
Approved
1998-01-22
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1996-10-24
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
1996-10-24
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Split
1996-10-24
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperBelleview PLC
Coverage4 London boroughs
Applications7 (1996–00)
Units sought
Approval rate80%
London rank#7025 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.