Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersBt Property
Planning AtlasDevelopersBT Property
Developer · London

BT Property.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 6 applications in 5 boroughs, at a 100% approval rate, 1998–08.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer5 boroughs100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
6
Applications
London 1998–08
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’98’99’00’01’02’08
What they build — by scheme type
6decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 1998–08.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Wandsworth
Advertisements
Refused
2008-11-27
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-10-24
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-09-04
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-01-05
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-02-10
Southwark
Minor application
Approved
1999-07-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-06-08
Wandsworth
Advertisements
Refused
2008-11-27
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-10-24
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-09-04
Show all 7 rows
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-01-05
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-02-10
Southwark
Minor application
Approved
1999-07-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-06-08
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperBT Property
Coverage5 London boroughs
Applications6 (1998–08)
Units sought
Approval rate100%
London rank#7612 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.