Developer · London
Castlemore Securities Ltd.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 14 applications in 6 boroughs, seeking 4 residential units, at a 80% approval rate, 2001–12.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer4 units sought6 boroughs80% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →14
Applications
London 2001–12
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because they appear as the applicant on 14 applications and as the agent on only 4.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Bexley
Major Outline Application
Withdrawn
2012-03-21
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-04
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-04
Ealing
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-07-23
Barnet
Vary/Remove condition/Minor Mtl Amnd
Approved
2005-08-24
Barnet
Vary/Remove condition/Minor Mtl Amnd
Approved
2004-04-21
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2003-06-03
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-06
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-06
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-05
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-03
Brent
Observations-Other Boroughs Applications
No objection
2003-02-17
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2002-10
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2001-02
Bexley
Major Outline Application
Withdrawn
2012-03-21
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-04
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-04
Show all 19 rows
Ealing
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-07-23
Barnet
Vary/Remove condition/Minor Mtl Amnd
Approved
2005-08-24
Barnet
Vary/Remove condition/Minor Mtl Amnd
Approved
2004-04-21
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2003-06-03
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-06
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-06
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-05
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2003-03
Brent
Observations-Other Boroughs Applications
No objection
2003-02-17
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2002-10
Newham
Full Planning Permission
—
2001-02
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperCastlemore Securities Ltd
Coverage6 London boroughs
Applications14 (2001–12)
Units sought4
Approval rate80%
London rank#3929 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.