Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersCheshire Developments Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopers` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
Developer · London

` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 3 applications in 1 borough, at a 0 approved · 0 refused approval rate, 1999.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer1 borough0 approved · 0 refused approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
3
Applications
London 1999
Listed building
Mostly submits
2 applications of this type — no proposal states a residential unit count
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is ` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 3 applications.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
3
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
3
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.
What they build — by scheme type
3decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
3
0 approved · 3 refused
3
0 approved · 3 refused

Where this developer builds, 1999.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
1999-03-08
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1999-03-08
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
1999-03-04
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
1999-03-08
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1999-03-08
Hackney
Listed Building Consent
Withdrawn
1999-03-04
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
Developer` CHESHIRE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
Coverage1 London borough
Applications3 (1999)
Units sought
Approval rate0 approved · 0 refused
London rank#12395 of 14,955
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.