Developer · London
Circle 33 Housing.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 25 applications in 5 boroughs, seeking 10 residential units, at a 84% approval rate, 2000–17.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer10 units sought5 boroughs84% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →25
Applications
London 2000–17
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
No objection
2017-06-23
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2013-11-26
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2005-03-11
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Withdrawn
2004-12-10
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-04-08
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-01-29
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-01-28
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-12-19
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-25
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-25
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-04
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-10-28
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-10-22
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-10-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-24
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-04-23
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-02-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-01-17
Camden
Notification of Intended Works to Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
No objection
2000-04-26
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
No objection
2017-06-23
Show all 39 rows
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2013-11-26
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2005-03-11
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Withdrawn
2004-12-10
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-04-08
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-01-29
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2004-01-28
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-12-19
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-25
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-25
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-11-04
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-10-28
Hackney
Works to a Tree in Conservation Area Notification
Approved
2003-10-22
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-10-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-07-24
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-04-23
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2003-03-25
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-02-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2003-01-17
Camden
Notification of Intended Works to Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
No objection
2000-04-26
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperCircle 33 Housing
Coverage5 London boroughs
Applications25 (2000–17)
Units sought10
Approval rate84%
London rank#3078 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.