Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersCroft Homes Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersCROFT HOMES LTD
Developer · London

CROFT HOMES LTD.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 25 applications in 8 boroughs, seeking 53 residential units, at a 91% approval rate, 1996–22.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer53 units sought8 boroughs91% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
25
Applications
London 1996–22
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’96’97’98’99’00’02’03’04’06’07’08’11’20’22
What they build — by scheme type
30decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
4
67%
4
100%
Show all 8 rows
2
100%
2
100%

Where this developer builds, 1996–22.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-03-25
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2020-11-30
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-02-08
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2008-06-24
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Refused
2008-03-14
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-12-13
Islington
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2004-05-06
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-10-13
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Withdrawn
2003-02-03
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2003-01-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-09-26
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-06-24
Lambeth
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2002-04-10
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-03-07
Greenwich
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2000-03-06
Greenwich
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-02-23
Enfield
Reserved Matters
Approved
1999-12-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-05-26
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-03-23
Brent
Outline Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1999-01-04
Brent
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
1998-11-19
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-10
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-04-08
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-11-11
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-10-10
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-09-22
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
1997-07-08
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-04-04
Islington
Approved
1996-04-04
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-03-25
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2020-11-30
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-02-08
Show all 31 rows
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2008-06-24
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Refused
2008-03-14
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-12-13
Islington
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2004-05-06
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2003-10-13
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Withdrawn
2003-02-03
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2003-01-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-09-26
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-06-24
Lambeth
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2002-04-10
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-03-07
Greenwich
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2000-03-06
Greenwich
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-02-23
Enfield
Reserved Matters
Approved
1999-12-30
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-05-26
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-03-23
Brent
Outline Planning Permission
Withdrawn
1999-01-04
Brent
Outline Planning Permission
Approved
1998-11-19
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1998-07-10
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-04-08
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-11-11
City Of London
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-10-10
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-09-22
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
1997-07-08
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-04-04
Islington
Approved
1996-04-04
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperCROFT HOMES LTD
Coverage8 London boroughs
Applications25 (1996–22)
Units sought53
Approval rate91%
London rank#1527 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.