Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersDairy Crest Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersDairy Crest Ltd
Developer · London

Dairy Crest Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 19 applications in 4 boroughs, seeking 52 residential units, at a 75% approval rate, 2001–12.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer52 units sought4 boroughs75% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
19
Applications
London 2001–12
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’01’02’05’06’07’08’09’10’12
What they build — by scheme type
20decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 2001–12.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2012-08-17
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2012-07-27
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-25
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-16
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2008-06-19
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2008-01-31
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Withdrawn
2007-11-13
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2007-10-16
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2007-09-13
Hounslow
Lawful Use Certificate
Refused
2007-08-09
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2006-04-03
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Refused
2005-06-28
Hounslow
Advertisement Application
Refused
2005-06-28
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2003-10-20
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-07-04
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2002-03-18
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-09-10
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-08-28
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Refused
2001-02-15
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2001-02-15
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
No determination
2001-02-08
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2001-01-10
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2012-08-17
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2012-07-27
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-11-25
Show all 22 rows
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-04-16
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2008-06-19
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2008-01-31
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Withdrawn
2007-11-13
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2007-10-16
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2007-09-13
Hounslow
Lawful Use Certificate
Refused
2007-08-09
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2006-04-03
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Refused
2005-06-28
Hounslow
Advertisement Application
Refused
2005-06-28
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2003-10-20
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2002-07-04
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2002-03-18
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-09-10
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-08-28
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
Refused
2001-02-15
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2001-02-15
Westminster
Conservation Area Consent Appl (CAC)
No determination
2001-02-08
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2001-01-10
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperDairy Crest Ltd
Coverage4 London boroughs
Applications19 (2001–12)
Units sought52
Approval rate75%
London rank#1535 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.