Planning consultancy · London
David Rosemont Associates Ltd.
A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 77% of applications — close to the London average of 79% — across 58 applications in 6 boroughs, 1997–10.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.
Planning consultancy14 years active6 boroughs77% approval
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
This is an individual's record. These applications are part of the Rosemont Associates Ltd record, which is the firm's public profile.
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 1 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →58
Applications
London 1997–10
0
Appeals
no appeal on record — every decision stood
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 53 decided applications
Why is David Rosemont Associates Ltd listed as a consultant?It is recorded as the planning agent on 58 applications.Is this your firm? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
David Rosemont Associates Ltd
46
77%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
David Rosemont Associates
12
80%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
58
77%
Each application counted once across all components
David Rosemont Associates Ltd
46
77%
Primary organisation name recorded as the planning agent
David Rosemont Associates
12
80%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
58
77%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: “David Rosemont Associates Ltd” (37) · “David Rosemont Associates” (12) · “David Rosemont” (7) · “David Rosemont Associates Limited” (2) · “DAVID ROSEMONT ASSOCIATES LTD” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
What they submit — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]
The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data
How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 6 rows
Where this firm's applications concentrate, 1997–10.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2009/3487
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2010-02-23
2009/3483
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2010-02-23
05/3088/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2006-01-16
2005/3068
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2005-09-12
04/05544/LBC
Listed Building Consent Application
Not required
2004-09-07
2002/4899
Application for Full Permission
No determination
2003-02-18
02/07190/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-01-20
02/03420/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-07-23
2002/2030
Application for Full Permission
—
2002-06-05
01/09822/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-02-20
2009/3487
Alter or Extend a Listed Building
Refused
2010-02-23
2009/3483
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2010-02-23
05/3088/HOT
Householder Application
Approved
2006-01-16
Show all 59 rows
2005/3068
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2005-09-12
04/05544/LBC
Listed Building Consent Application
Not required
2004-09-07
2002/4899
Application for Full Permission
No determination
2003-02-18
02/07190/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-01-20
02/03420/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-07-23
2002/2030
Application for Full Permission
—
2002-06-05
01/09822/FULL
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2002-02-20
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmDavid Rosemont Associates Ltd
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage6 London boroughs
Years active14 (1997–10)
Applications58
Approval rate77%
London avg79%
London rank–
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 1997–10. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
- [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
- [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.