Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersDenne Construction
Planning AtlasDevelopersDenne Construction
Developer · London

Denne Construction.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 5 applications in 9 boroughs, seeking 431 residential units, at a 100% approval rate, 1996–16.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer431 units sought9 boroughs100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
5
Applications
London 1996–16
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (5) and agent (4); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
40%70%100%’96’97’00’02’04’05’06’10’11’13’14’16
What they build — by scheme type
13decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 1996–16.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2016-07-01
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2014-12-04
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2013-11-25
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Withdrawn
2013-02-12
Brent
Variation of Conditions
Approved
2011-12-02
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2011-05-12
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2010-12-10
Wandsworth
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-12-12
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-06-10
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2004-07-21
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
2002-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Withdrawn
2001-10-31
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2000-11-14
Newham
Works to Trees Subject to a TPO
1997-09
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-08-28
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
1997-04-14
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1996-06-13
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
1996-05-28
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2016-07-01
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2014-12-04
Show all 20 rows
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2013-11-25
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Withdrawn
2013-02-12
Brent
Variation of Conditions
Approved
2011-12-02
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2011-05-12
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2010-12-10
Wandsworth
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2006-12-12
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-06-10
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2004-07-21
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
2002-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Withdrawn
2001-10-31
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2000-11-14
Newham
Works to Trees Subject to a TPO
1997-09
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-08-28
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
1997-04-14
Redbridge
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1996-06-13
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
1996-05-28
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperDenne Construction
Coverage9 London boroughs
Applications5 (1996–16)
Units sought431
Approval rate100%
London rank#515 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.