Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersEmpress Group
Planning AtlasDevelopersEmpress Group
Developer · London

Empress Group.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 15 applications in 4 boroughs, seeking 7 residential units, at a 40% approval rate, 1999–09.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer7 units sought4 boroughs40% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
15
Applications
London 1999–09
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’99’00’01’02’03’04’05’07’08’09
What they build — by scheme type
17decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 4 rows
1
100%

Where this developer builds, 1999–09.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-10-20
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-09-10
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2008-07-15
Enfield
Full
Approved
2007-02-16
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2005-05-24
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-11-03
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-08-06
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2004-07-30
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-03-16
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2003-02-05
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2002-11-14
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2001-05-17
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Existing
Approved
2001-01-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2001-01-01
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-03-22
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
1999-10-14
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-06-30
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-10-20
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2008-09-10
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2008-07-15
Show all 17 rows
Enfield
Full
Approved
2007-02-16
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2005-05-24
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-11-03
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-08-06
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2004-07-30
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2004-03-16
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2003-02-05
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2002-11-14
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2001-05-17
Waltham Forest
Certificate of Lawful Development - Existing
Approved
2001-01-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2001-01-01
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-03-22
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
1999-10-14
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-06-30
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperEmpress Group
Coverage4 London boroughs
Applications15 (1999–09)
Units sought7
Approval rate40%
London rank#3484 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.