Developer · London
Estates Division.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 15 applications in 3 boroughs, at a 38% approval rate, 2000–13.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer3 boroughs38% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 1 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →15
Applications
London 2000–13
Full / major planning
Mostly submits
8 applications of this type — no proposal states a residential unit count
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is Estates Division listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 15 applications.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
Estates Division
15
38%
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
Estates Division
15
38%
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
Recorded on council registers as: “Estates Division” (9) · “ESTATES DIVISION” (7)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this developer builds, 2000–13.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Show all 16 rows
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-08-14
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2000-08-14
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperEstates Division
Coverage3 London boroughs
Applications15 (2000–13)
Units sought—
Approval rate38%
London rank#4970 of 14,955
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.