Planning consultancy · London
G D Architects Limited.
A planning consultancy acting for applicants across London. Wins consent on 64% of applications — below the London average of 79% — across 575 applications in 26 boroughs, 1999–26.[1] Where they win, and how, is below.
Planning consultancy28 years active26 boroughs64% approval185th in LondonCompanies House 03819038
Where they win — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →575
Applications
London 1999–26
0%
Appeal success
0 of 8 appeals allowed (PINS decisions on this firm's applications)
8 wks
Decision time
median, validation to decision · 513 decided applications
Why a consultant? Listed as a consultant because they appear as the agent on 575 applications and as the applicant on only 4.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your firm?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingDashed line = London average
What they submit — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Policies they argue — and how often it wins[3]
The policies this consultancy leans on most across its applications — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy playbook is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this firm submits— subscriber data
How often each named case officer grants consent on this firm's applications. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 26 rows
Where this firm's applications concentrate, 1999–26.[1] Click the map above to focus a borough, or a row to open it.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 agreements aren't yet traced to this firm's consents — the borough-by-borough table of contributions secured publishes when the section 106 agreements are ingested. No figure is shown until it's real.
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
26/00633/PAEXTF
PA Householder Rear Extn - Fast Track
Refused
2026-04-28
DM2025/01084
PA Householder Rear Extension
Not required
2025-09-25
25/01516/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2025-09-10
25/01646/PAEXTF
PA Householder Rear Extn - Fast Track
Not required
2025-07-30
2025/1563
Full Planning Permission
—
2025-07-09
25/P0098
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2025-03-07
25/P0621
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-03-03
21/P2738
Full Planning Permission
No determination
2025-02-12
Show all 60 rows
26/00633/PAEXTF
PA Householder Rear Extn - Fast Track
Refused
2026-04-28
DM2025/01084
PA Householder Rear Extension
Not required
2025-09-25
25/01516/FUL
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2025-09-10
25/01646/PAEXTF
PA Householder Rear Extn - Fast Track
Not required
2025-07-30
2025/1563
Full Planning Permission
—
2025-07-09
25/P0098
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2025-03-07
25/P0621
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-03-03
21/P2738
Full Planning Permission
No determination
2025-02-12
Developers they act for— subscriber data
At a glance
FirmG D Architects Limited
TypePlanning consultancy
Coverage26 London boroughs
Years active28 (1999–26)
Applications575
Approval rate64%
London avg79%
London rank185th of 46,134
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate and borough breakdown — the London planning applications on which this firm is the named agent, from borough planning registers and published decision notices, 1999–26. The consultant is the COMPANY (a firm filing under several individuals is merged to the firm). "Named agent" means whoever submitted the application to the council — where a separate agent files on behalf of the actual architect or designer, that design credit isn't captured here; this reflects who submitted, not necessarily who designed. Approval rate = approved ÷ (approved + refused), substantive decisions only. · methodology
- [2]Case-officer and developer pairings — the named case officer and applicant company on each of this firm’s register records, joined to their own live profiles. Pairing patterns, not endorsements. · methodology
- [3]Policies argued are coded from each officer report and decision notice against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — publishes with decision-notice ingestion. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.