Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersIdm Properties Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersIDM Properties
Developer · London

IDM Properties.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 15 applications in 7 boroughs, seeking 458 residential units, at a 46% approval rate, 2011–20.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer458 units sought7 boroughs46% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 9 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
15
Applications
London 2011–20
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is IDM Properties listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 15 applications.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
IDM Properties Ltd
8
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
IDM Properties
4
0%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
IDM Properties LLP
3
0%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
15
46%
Each application counted once across all components
IDM Properties Ltd
8
75%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
IDM Properties
4
0%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
IDM Properties LLP
3
0%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Show all 4 rows
Total
15
46%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: IDM Properties” (8) · IDM Properties Ltd” (8) · IDM Properties LLP” (5) · ` IDM Properties LLP” (2) · IDM PROPERTIES LLP” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’11’13’14’15’18’19’20
What they build — by scheme type
24decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
9
7 approved · 2 refused
5
2 approved · 3 refused
3
0 approved · 3 refused
2
0 approved · 2 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
0 approved · 2 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused
9
7 approved · 2 refused
5
2 approved · 3 refused
3
0 approved · 3 refused
Show all 7 rows
2
0 approved · 2 refused
2
2 approved · 0 refused
2
0 approved · 2 refused
1
0 approved · 1 refused

Where this developer builds, 2011–20.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Harrow
Prior Approval (Miscellaneous Acts)
Refused
2020-02-14
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2019-02-14
Enfield
Full
Refused
2018-11-21
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2018-11-21
Islington
Prior Approval (Office to Residential)
Refused
2018-06-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Details to Meet Conditions Full/Outline
Approved
2015-05-21
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2014-12-16
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-12-04
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-11-24
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-10-16
Tower Hamlets
London Legacy Development Corporation
2014-10
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-09-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-09-19
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2014-09-09
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-08-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Householder Application
Refused
2014-06-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
Approved
2014-04-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
Refused
2014-04-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 191Cert Existing Lawful Use/Dev
Withdrawn
2014-03-05
Hammersmith And Fulham
Prior Approval - GPDO Part 1 - 56 Days
Approved
2013-11-11
Hackney
Removal/Variation of Condition(s)
Approved
2011-08-10
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2011-06-01
Tower Hamlets
London Legacy Development Corporation
Harrow
Prior Approval (Miscellaneous Acts)
Refused
2020-02-14
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2019-02-14
Enfield
Full
Refused
2018-11-21
Show all 24 rows
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2018-11-21
Islington
Prior Approval (Office to Residential)
Refused
2018-06-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Details to Meet Conditions Full/Outline
Approved
2015-05-21
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2014-12-16
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-12-04
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-11-24
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-10-16
Tower Hamlets
London Legacy Development Corporation
2014-10
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-09-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-09-19
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Refused
2014-09-09
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2014-08-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Householder Application
Refused
2014-06-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
Approved
2014-04-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
Refused
2014-04-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 191Cert Existing Lawful Use/Dev
Withdrawn
2014-03-05
Hammersmith And Fulham
Prior Approval - GPDO Part 1 - 56 Days
Approved
2013-11-11
Hackney
Removal/Variation of Condition(s)
Approved
2011-08-10
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2011-06-01
Tower Hamlets
London Legacy Development Corporation
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperIDM Properties
Coverage7 London boroughs
Applications15 (2011–20)
Units sought458
Approval rate46%
London rank#453 of 14,955
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.