Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersInforum Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersInforum Ltd
Developer · London

Inforum Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 32 applications in 5 boroughs, seeking 20 residential units, at a 83% approval rate, 2006–20.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer20 units sought5 boroughs83% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
32
Applications
London 2006–20
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
50%75%100%’06’07’08’10
What they build — by scheme type
40decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 2006–20.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2010-02-16
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2010-02-08
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Refused
2008-11-18
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Refused
2008-11-18
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2008-08-20
Newham
Approval of Details
Approved
2008-05-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-05-15
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-04-29
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-28
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-27
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-13
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-13
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-10-01
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Withdrawn
2007-09-24
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-08-30
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-08-23
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-08-09
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-11
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-11
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2007-07-03
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-06-06
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-02-02
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-21
Redbridge
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2006-11-21
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-09-19
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-08-16
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-07-20
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-06-08
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Withdrawn
2006-04-05
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2006-04-05
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2020-11-16
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2010-02-16
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2010-02-08
Show all 40 rows
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Refused
2008-11-18
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Refused
2008-11-18
Redbridge
Discharge of Condition(s)
Approved
2008-08-20
Newham
Approval of Details
Approved
2008-05-27
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-05-15
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-04-29
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-28
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-27
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-02-13
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2008-02-06
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-13
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-12-03
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-10-01
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Withdrawn
2007-09-24
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-08-30
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-08-23
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-08-09
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-19
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-11
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Approved
2007-07-11
Redbridge
Details Following Outline (Reserved Matters)
Refused
2007-07-03
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2007-06-06
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-02-02
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-21
Redbridge
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2006-11-21
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-09-19
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-08-16
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-07-20
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-06-08
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Withdrawn
2006-04-05
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2006-04-05
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperInforum Ltd
Coverage5 London boroughs
Applications32 (2006–20)
Units sought20
Approval rate83%
London rank#2358 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.