Developer · London
Interserve Plc.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 3 applications in 3 boroughs, at a 100% approval rate, 2015–i .[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer3 boroughs100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →3
Applications
London 2015–i
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (3) and agent (8); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this developer builds, 2015–i .[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Permit
Fri 29 Apr
Kingston Upon Thames
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2017-12-22
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2017-11-20
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-05-15
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-12-07
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Approved
2016-11-11
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2016-10-14
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Approved
2016-04-29
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-11-19
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Permit
Fri 29 Apr
Kingston Upon Thames
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2017-12-22
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2017-11-20
Show all 9 rows
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2017-05-15
Kingston Upon Thames
Details Reserved by Condition
Approved
2016-12-07
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Approved
2016-11-11
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2016-10-14
Tower Hamlets
Non-material amendment (TCPA S96a)
Approved
2016-04-29
Kingston Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-11-19
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperInterserve Plc
Coverage3 London boroughs
Applications3 (2015–i )
Units sought—
Approval rate100%
London rank#14420 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.