Developer · London
Ionica Plc.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 21 applications in 16 boroughs, at a 83% approval rate, 1997–01.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer16 boroughs83% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →21
Applications
London 1997–01
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 16 rows
Where this developer builds, 1997–01.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2001-01-01
Bexley
Historic Record - type unknown
Withdrawn
1998-06-29
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-04-23
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-04-23
Enfield
Full
Withdrawn
1998-04-07
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-03-04
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-01-27
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Refused
1998-01-22
Wandsworth
Telecoms Apparatus (Historic)
Approved
1998-01-15
Newham
Telecommunications Notification
—
1998-01
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-12-17
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Not required
1997-12-16
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1997-12-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
1997-12-09
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-11-28
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Not required
1997-11-24
Croydon
Telecommunications Code Systems Opera
Not required
1997-11-12
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-11-11
Merton
Prior Approval - Telecommunications (masts, poles, cabinets etc)
Not required
1997-09-19
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-09-17
Croydon
Observations on permitted development
Not required
1997-09-11
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-09-11
Islington
Prior Approval (Telecommunications)
Not required
1997-09-09
Croydon
Telecommunications Code Systems Opera
Withdrawn
1997-09-03
Bexley
Historic Record - type unknown
Approved
1997-06-20
Newham
Telecommunications Notification
—
1997-04-25
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-04-02
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2001-01-01
Show all 57 rows
Bexley
Historic Record - type unknown
Withdrawn
1998-06-29
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-04-23
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-04-23
Enfield
Full
Withdrawn
1998-04-07
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-03-04
Lambeth
Approval under GDPO pt 24 (telecoms)
Approved
1998-01-27
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Refused
1998-01-22
Wandsworth
Telecoms Apparatus (Historic)
Approved
1998-01-15
Newham
Telecommunications Notification
—
1998-01
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-12-17
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Not required
1997-12-16
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
1997-12-15
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
1997-12-09
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-11-28
Redbridge
Prior Approval Determination
Not required
1997-11-24
Croydon
Telecommunications Code Systems Opera
Not required
1997-11-12
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-11-11
Merton
Prior Approval - Telecommunications (masts, poles, cabinets etc)
Not required
1997-09-19
Enfield
Prior Approval Telecoms
Not required
1997-09-17
Croydon
Observations on permitted development
Not required
1997-09-11
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-09-11
Islington
Prior Approval (Telecommunications)
Not required
1997-09-09
Croydon
Telecommunications Code Systems Opera
Withdrawn
1997-09-03
Bexley
Historic Record - type unknown
Approved
1997-06-20
Newham
Telecommunications Notification
—
1997-04-25
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1997-04-02
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperIonica Plc
Coverage16 London boroughs
Applications21 (1997–01)
Units sought—
Approval rate83%
London rank#5137 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.