Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersJ S Developments
Planning AtlasDevelopers` J & S Developments
Developer · London

` J & S Developments.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 4 applications in 2 boroughs, seeking 2 residential units, at a 3 approved · 1 refused approval rate, 2000–04.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer2 units sought2 boroughs3 approved · 1 refused approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
4
Applications
London 2000–04
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is ` J & S Developments listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 4 applications.Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
` J & S Developments
4
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
` J & S Developments
4
Organisation name or verified alias recorded as the applicant
Recorded on council registers as: ` J & S Developments” (2) · ` J & S DEVELOPMENTS” (1) · J&S DEVELOPMENTS” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’00’02’03’04
What they build — by scheme type
4decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
3
2 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
3
2 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused

Where this developer builds, 2000–04.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-09-22
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-03-31
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-11-15
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-10-31
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-09-22
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-03-31
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-11-15
Show all 4 rows
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2000-10-31
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
Developer` J & S Developments
Coverage2 London boroughs
Applications4 (2000–04)
Units sought2
Approval rate3 approved · 1 refused
London rank#4197 of 14,955
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.