Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersKeybridge House Llp
Planning AtlasDevelopersKeybridge House LLP
Developer · London

Keybridge House LLP.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 3 applications in 1 borough, seeking 10,375 residential units, at a 33% approval rate, 2015–22.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer10,375 units sought1 borough33% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
3
Applications
London 2015–22
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’15’16’19’21’22
What they build — by scheme type
29decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
31
93%
31
93%

Where this developer builds, 2015–22.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2022-06-30
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2021-07-13
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2021-06-17
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2019-05-07
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Withdrawn
2016-07-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-06-02
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-06-02
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-05-11
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-26
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-02-08
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-12
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-12-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-12-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-21
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-21
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-26
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2015-08-24
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-21
Lambeth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2015-08-19
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2015-07-07
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-06-30
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2015-05-05
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-04-17
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2022-06-30
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2021-07-13
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2021-06-17
Show all 31 rows
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2019-05-07
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Withdrawn
2016-07-14
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-06-02
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-06-02
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-05-11
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-26
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-04-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-02-08
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-01-12
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-12-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-12-15
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-23
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-21
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-09-21
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-26
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2015-08-24
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-08-21
Lambeth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2015-08-19
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Approved
2015-07-07
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-06-30
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2015-05-05
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-04-17
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperKeybridge House LLP
Coverage1 London borough
Applications3 (2015–22)
Units sought10,375
Approval rate33%
London rank#38 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.