Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersKodak Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersKODAK LTD
Developer · London

KODAK LTD.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 32 applications in 1 borough, at a 100% approval rate, 1996–11.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer1 borough100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
32
Applications
London 1996–11
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because they appear as the applicant on 32 applications and as the agent on only 3.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
90%95%100%’96’97’98’99’00’01’02’03’04’06’07’11
What they build — by scheme type
33decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
33
100%
33
100%

Where this developer builds, 1996–11.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2011-09-22
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-02-05
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-31
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-15
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-11-24
Harrow
Removal/Variation of Condition(s)
Approved
2003-03-17
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-09-09
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-02-22
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-09-18
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-02-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-02-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-01-27
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-11-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-10-18
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-07-06
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-12-11
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-12-03
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-07-17
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-01-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-12-10
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-07-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-02-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-02-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-12-13
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-10-30
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-09-26
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-07-19
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-06-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-05-31
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-04-24
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2011-09-22
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-02-05
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-31
Show all 33 rows
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2007-01-15
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2006-11-24
Harrow
Removal/Variation of Condition(s)
Approved
2003-03-17
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2002-09-09
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2001-02-22
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-09-18
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-02-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-02-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
2000-01-27
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-11-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-10-18
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1999-07-06
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-12-11
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-12-03
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-07-17
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-01-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-12-10
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-07-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-02-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1997-02-25
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-12-13
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-10-30
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-09-26
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-07-19
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-06-21
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-05-31
Harrow
Full Planning Application
Approved
1996-04-24
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperKODAK LTD
Coverage1 London borough
Applications32 (1996–11)
Units sought
Approval rate100%
London rank#4967 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.