Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersLangholm Property Co Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersLangholm Property Co Ltd
Developer · London

Langholm Property Co Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 27 applications in 4 boroughs, seeking 19 residential units, at a 79% approval rate, 2003–10.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer19 units sought4 boroughs79% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 3 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
27
Applications
London 2003–10
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is Langholm Property Co Ltd listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 27 applications.Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
Langholm Property Co Ltd
22
74%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
Langholm Property Company Ltd
5
100%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
27
79%
Each application counted once across all components
Langholm Property Co Ltd
22
74%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
Langholm Property Company Ltd
5
100%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
27
79%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: Langholm Property Co Ltd” (20) · Langholm Property Company Ltd” (5) · Langholm Property Co. Ltd” (3) · Langholm Property Company Limited” (2)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
40%70%100%’03’04’05’06’07’08’10
What they build — by scheme type
29decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
12
58% (7/5)
9
7 approved · 2 refused
8
7 approved · 1 refused
1
1 approved · 0 refused
12
58% (7/5)
9
7 approved · 2 refused
8
7 approved · 1 refused
Show all 4 rows
1
1 approved · 0 refused

Where this developer builds, 2003–10.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-03-04
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-06-06
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2008-02-22
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-03-01
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-02-09
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2006-11-23
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-21
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-07
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-10-16
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-09-29
Wandsworth
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2005-05-10
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2004-12-08
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-11-17
Wandsworth
Conservation Area Consent (demolition)
Approved
2004-10-15
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-10-15
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-08-24
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-08-19
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2004-06-30
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2004-04-29
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-02-20
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-12-01
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-11-14
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-09-25
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-09-24
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-26
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-22
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-07-17
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2003-06-23
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-06-16
Merton
Lawful Development Certificate - Proposed - Section 192
Approved
2003-05-02
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2010-03-04
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2008-06-06
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2008-02-22
Show all 30 rows
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-03-01
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-02-09
Merton
Tree(s) in a Conservation Area
Approved
2006-11-23
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-21
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2006-11-07
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2006-10-16
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-09-29
Wandsworth
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2005-05-10
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2004-12-08
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-11-17
Wandsworth
Conservation Area Consent (demolition)
Approved
2004-10-15
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-10-15
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-08-24
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2004-08-19
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Withdrawn
2004-06-30
Sutton
Full Application
Approved
2004-04-29
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2004-02-20
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-12-01
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-11-14
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-09-25
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2003-09-24
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-26
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-08-22
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2003-07-17
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2003-06-23
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2003-06-16
Merton
Lawful Development Certificate - Proposed - Section 192
Approved
2003-05-02
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperLangholm Property Co Ltd
Coverage4 London boroughs
Applications27 (2003–10)
Units sought19
Approval rate79%
London rank#2195 of 14,955
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.