Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersLindhill Construction Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersLindhill Construction Ltd.
Developer · London

Lindhill Construction Ltd..

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 3 applications in 3 boroughs, at a 100% approval rate, 1998–99.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer3 boroughs100% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
3
Applications
London 1998–99
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (3) and agent (4); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
90%95%100%’98
What they build — by scheme type
6decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 1998–99.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
No objection
1999-04-06
Enfield
Reserved Matters
Approved
1998-10-28
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Withdrawn
1998-08-13
Southwark
Major application
Approved
1998-08-05
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
1998-04-30
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
No objection
1999-04-06
Enfield
Reserved Matters
Approved
1998-10-28
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Withdrawn
1998-08-13
Show all 6 rows
Southwark
Major application
Approved
1998-08-05
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
1998-04-30
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperLindhill Construction Ltd.
Coverage3 London boroughs
Applications3 (1998–99)
Units sought
Approval rate100%
London rank#13311 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.