Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersMarijak Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersMarijak Limited
Developer · London

Marijak Limited.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 7 applications in 2 boroughs, seeking 6 residential units, at a 50% approval rate, 2001–23.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer6 units sought2 boroughs50% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
7
Applications
London 2001–23
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’01’05’19’20’23
What they build — by scheme type
7decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate

Where this developer builds, 2001–23.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2023-08-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2020-12-04
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2019-11-12
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2017-10-27
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2005-12-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2005-05-09
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-12-28
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2023-08-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2020-12-04
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2019-11-12
Show all 7 rows
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Withdrawn
2017-10-27
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2005-12-01
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Refused
2005-05-09
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-12-28
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperMarijak Limited
Coverage2 London boroughs
Applications7 (2001–23)
Units sought6
Approval rate50%
London rank#3613 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.