Developer · London
Mills & Allen Ltd.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 17 applications in 24 boroughs, seeking 16 residential units, at a 33% approval rate, 1996–97.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer16 units sought24 boroughs33% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →17
Applications
London 1996–97
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (17) and agent (7); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 24 rows
Where this developer builds, 1996–97.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2020-11-16
Ealing
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-07-06
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2001-06-13
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-03-13
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
2001-03-13
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2001-02-08
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-01-01
Greenwich
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-11-15
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-10-25
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1999-11-18
Greenwich
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-08-18
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1999-07-16
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-02-15
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-02-08
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
No determination
1999-01-01
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1998-11-10
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1998-08-18
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-07-17
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
1998-05-27
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-11-11
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
1997-09-11
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
1997-08-26
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
1997-08-26
Hackney
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-08-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Refused
1997-08-12
Hackney
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1997-07-25
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-07-25
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1997-07-25
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2020-11-16
Show all 60 rows
Ealing
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-07-06
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2001-06-13
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-03-13
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
2001-03-13
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2001-02-08
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-01-01
Greenwich
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-11-15
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-10-25
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1999-11-18
Greenwich
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-08-18
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1999-07-16
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-02-15
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1999-02-08
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
No determination
1999-01-01
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1998-11-10
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1998-08-18
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-07-17
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
1998-05-27
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-11-11
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
1997-09-11
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
1997-08-26
City Of London
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
1997-08-26
Hackney
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-08-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Advertisement
Refused
1997-08-12
Hackney
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1997-07-25
Merton
Advertisement Consent
Approved
1997-07-25
Tower Hamlets
Advertisement Consent
Refused
1997-07-25
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperMills & Allen Ltd
Coverage24 London boroughs
Applications17 (1996–97)
Units sought16
Approval rate33%
London rank#2570 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.