Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersMitchells Butler Retail Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersMitchells & Butler Retail Ltd
Developer · London

Mitchells & Butler Retail Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 15 applications in 9 boroughs, at a 93% approval rate, 2003–14.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer9 boroughs93% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
15
Applications
London 2003–14
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
50%75%100%’03’04’05’06’07’09’11’14
What they build — by scheme type
18decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
12
82%
Show all 9 rows
1
100%

Where this developer builds, 2003–14.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-12-03
Camden
Tables and Chairs
Approved
2011-10-07
Camden
Tables and Chairs
Approved
2009-04-28
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2007-07-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2007-06-27
Harrow
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2007-05-08
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-03-29
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2007-03-28
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2007-03-20
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-03-20
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Split
2007-03-20
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2006-07-18
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2006-04-18
Camden
Approval of Details (Listed Building)
Approved
2006-02-17
Camden
Approval of Details
Refused
2006-01-19
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-12-20
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2005-12-19
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-12-12
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2005-10-21
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2005-07-08
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2005-06-20
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-05-19
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2004-08-19
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2003-09-10
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-12-03
Camden
Tables and Chairs
Approved
2011-10-07
Camden
Tables and Chairs
Approved
2009-04-28
Show all 25 rows
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2007-07-04
Richmond Upon Thames
Application to Display Adverts
Refused
2007-06-27
Harrow
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2007-05-08
Camden
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-03-29
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2007-03-28
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2007-03-20
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2007-03-20
Enfield
Advertisement Consent
Split
2007-03-20
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2006-07-18
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2006-04-18
Camden
Approval of Details (Listed Building)
Approved
2006-02-17
Camden
Approval of Details
Refused
2006-01-19
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2005-12-20
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2005-12-19
Lewisham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-12-12
Camden
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2005-10-21
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-10-21
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2005-07-08
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2005-06-20
Redbridge
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-05-19
Westminster
Applic. for tables and chairs
Approved
2004-08-19
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2003-09-10
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperMitchells & Butler Retail Ltd
Coverage9 London boroughs
Applications15 (2003–14)
Units sought
Approval rate93%
London rank#5407 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.