Developer · London
Posters Limited.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 4 applications in 16 boroughs, seeking 14 residential units, at a 0% approval rate, 1997–20.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer14 units sought16 boroughs0% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →4
Applications
London 1997–20
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this developer builds, 1997–20.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Refused
2011-04-14
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-06-05
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2003-09-18
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
2001-12-12
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-04-04
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2001-02-07
Harrow
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-11-07
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
2000-10-04
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1999-08-18
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1997-10-16
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Refused
2011-04-14
Show all 37 rows
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2006-06-05
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Approved
2003-09-18
Brent
Advertisement consent
Refused
2001-12-12
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2001-04-04
Lambeth
Advertisement Consent
Withdrawn
2001-02-07
Harrow
Advertisement Consent
Refused
2000-11-07
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
2000-10-04
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1999-08-18
Barking And Dagenham
Consent to Display an Advertisement(s)
Refused
1997-10-16
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperPosters Limited
Coverage16 London boroughs
Applications4 (1997–20)
Units sought14
Approval rate0%
London rank#2772 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.