Developer · London
R & I Grant & Co Ltd.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 23 applications in 3 boroughs, seeking 44 residential units, at a 58% approval rate, 1996–13.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer44 units sought3 boroughs58% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
Headline figures count substantive applications only — full, householder and listed building. 1 further procedural applications (S73 variations, condition discharges, prior approvals, certificates, trees, adverts) are on the record: toggle All to include them.
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →23
Applications
London 1996–13
0
Refusals overturned
no refusal has been overturned at appeal
Why is R & I Grant & Co Ltd listed as a developer?It is recorded as the applicant bringing forward 23 applications.Is this your organisation? Claim it — free →Add your logo, contact details and project photos, and correct your record — free.
Record component
Applications
Approval rate
Basis
R & I Grant & Co Ltd
17
62%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
R & I Grant & Company Ltd
6
50%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
23
58%
Each application counted once across all components
R & I Grant & Co Ltd
17
62%
Primary organisation name recorded as the applicant
R & I Grant & Company Ltd
6
50%
Verified alias on the planning record — merged into this identity
Total
23
58%
Each application counted once across all components
Recorded on council registers as: “R & I Grant & Co Ltd” (7) · “R & I Grant & Company Ltd” (6) · “R&I Grant & Co. Ltd” (3) · “R & I GRANT & CO.LTD” (2) · “R &I Grant & Co Ltd” (1) · “R & I GRANT & CO. LTD” (1) · “R & I Grant & Co. Ltd.” (1) · “R&I Grant & Co Ltd” (1)
Possible matches that cannot be tied to this checked identity are excluded rather than guessed.
Something not right?
Worked on an application here but didn't submit it? Team credits — architects and project teams shown on schemes they worked on — are coming. Claim your profile and we'll tell you when it's live.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Where this developer builds, 1996–13.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-08-01
Show all 24 rows
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2005-08-01
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperR & I Grant & Co Ltd
Coverage3 London boroughs
Applications23 (1996–13)
Units sought44
Approval rate58%
London rank#1505 of 14,955
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.