Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersRainbow Properties Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersRainbow Properties Ltd
Developer · London

Rainbow Properties Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 25 applications in 7 boroughs, seeking 8 residential units, at a 78% approval rate, 1999–e .[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer8 units sought7 boroughs78% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
25
Applications
London 1999–e
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
20%60%100%’99’00’01’03’05’06’09’10’11’12’13’15’16’17’18
What they build — by scheme type
31decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
7
71%
5
100%
Show all 7 rows
4
50%

Where this developer builds, 1999–e .[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Tower Hamlets
Variation / Removal Condition (TCPA S73)
Permit
Tue 03 Dec
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-05-02
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2017-09-20
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2017-04-05
Brent
Householder
Approved
2016-08-18
Brent
Householder
Approved
2015-12-14
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-04-08
Tower Hamlets
Variation / Removal Condition (TCPA S73)
Approved
2013-12-03
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2012-01-31
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2011-11-30
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-10
Brent
Householder
Approved
2011-10-31
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-06-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-06-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2010-04-21
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-03-24
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2010-03-19
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-10-26
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2008-02-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Refused
2006-08-08
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2006-04-10
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-04-11
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-03-23
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-05-22
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-08-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-04-24
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-07-06
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-12-22
Tower Hamlets
Variation / Removal Condition (TCPA S73)
Permit
Tue 03 Dec
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2018-05-02
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2017-09-20
Show all 31 rows
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2017-04-05
Brent
Householder
Approved
2016-08-18
Brent
Householder
Approved
2015-12-14
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2015-04-08
Tower Hamlets
Variation / Removal Condition (TCPA S73)
Approved
2013-12-03
Hackney
Discharge of Condition
Approved
2012-01-31
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2011-11-30
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-11-10
Brent
Householder
Approved
2011-10-31
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-06-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-06-03
Islington
Full Planning Application
Refused
2010-04-21
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2010-03-24
Camden
Approval of Details
Approved
2010-03-19
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2009-10-26
Barnet
Conservation Area Consent
Withdrawn
2008-02-29
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Refused
2006-08-08
Hackney
Certificate of Lawful Development Existing/Proposed
Approved
2006-04-10
Barnet
Full Application
Approved
2005-04-11
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2005-03-23
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Approved
2003-05-22
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2001-08-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2001-04-24
Hackney
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2000-07-06
Tower Hamlets
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-12-22
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperRainbow Properties Ltd
Coverage7 London boroughs
Applications25 (1999–e )
Units sought8
Approval rate78%
London rank#3322 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.