Planning Atlas
AtlasDevelopersRoundlistic Ltd
Planning AtlasDevelopersRoundlistic Ltd
Developer · London

Roundlistic Ltd.

A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 54 applications in 6 boroughs, seeking 43 residential units, at a 45% approval rate, 1996–17.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.

Developer43 units sought6 boroughs45% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
54
Applications
London 1996–17
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? Listed as a developer because every application we hold for them names them as the applicant.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Claim this profile →
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
0%50%100%’96’97’98’99’00’02’03’04’05’06’08’09’10’11’12’13’14’15
What they build — by scheme type
61decisions

Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.

Their planning record — policies in play

The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.

Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits

How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.

The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough

Where this developer builds, 1996–17.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.

Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2017-03-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-08-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Refused
2015-08-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-05-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-03-26
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-03-26
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-11-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
No determination
2014-10-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2013-11-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2013-09-06
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2013-01-22
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2012-10-01
Camden
Non-Material Amendments
Approved
2012-04-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2012-04-05
Camden
Householder Application
Approved
2012-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2011-12-20
Camden
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2011-10-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2011-09-20
Lambeth
Information only NOT FOR PUBLIC VIEWING
2011-09-13
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2011-02-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 192 Permitted Development
Approved
2010-08-25
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2009-11-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Refused
2009-09-08
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-08-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 191Cert Existing Lawful Use/Dev
Approved
2008-12-15
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2008-04-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2007-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Refused
2006-12-14
Richmond Upon Thames
Conservation Area Consent
No determination
2006-08-16
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2006-01-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2005-10-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Approved
2005-10-04
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2005-09-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
No determination
2005-08-03
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2005-08-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2005-08-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2005-02-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Approved
2005-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2004-12-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Conservation Area Consent
No determination
2004-08-26
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-06-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2004-05-28
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2003-07-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Refused
2003-07-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-10-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-10-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2002-04-25
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2001-09-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2000-09-14
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-08-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-11-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-10-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-10-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
1998-05-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-04-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
1997-07-31
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
1997-07-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2017-03-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2015-08-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Refused
2015-08-18
Show all 60 rows
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2015-05-20
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-03-26
Lambeth
Approval of Details
Approved
2015-03-26
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2014-11-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Prior Approval Offices to Dwellings
No determination
2014-10-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2013-11-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2013-09-06
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2013-01-22
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2012-10-01
Camden
Non-Material Amendments
Approved
2012-04-19
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2012-04-05
Camden
Householder Application
Approved
2012-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2011-12-20
Camden
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2011-10-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2011-09-20
Lambeth
Information only NOT FOR PUBLIC VIEWING
2011-09-13
Wandsworth
Application for Full Permission
Refused
2011-02-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 192 Permitted Development
Approved
2010-08-25
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Approved
2009-11-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Reserved Matters DD Submission
Refused
2009-09-08
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2009-08-17
Richmond Upon Thames
Section 191Cert Existing Lawful Use/Dev
Approved
2008-12-15
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2008-04-09
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2007-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Refused
2006-12-14
Richmond Upon Thames
Conservation Area Consent
No determination
2006-08-16
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2006-01-13
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2005-10-20
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Approved
2005-10-04
Westminster
Full Planning Permission Application
Refused
2005-09-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
No determination
2005-08-03
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2005-08-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2005-08-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2005-02-24
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Approved
2005-01-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2004-12-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Conservation Area Consent
No determination
2004-08-26
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Withdrawn
2004-06-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2004-05-28
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2003-07-08
Richmond Upon Thames
Change of Use
Refused
2003-07-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-10-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-10-07
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
2002-07-18
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2002-04-25
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
2001-09-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
2000-09-14
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
1999-08-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Full Planning Application
Approved
1998-11-27
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-10-29
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-10-21
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
No determination
1998-05-01
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Refused
1998-04-30
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
1997-07-31
Richmond Upon Thames
Full Application
Approved
1997-07-18
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperRoundlistic Ltd
Coverage6 London boroughs
Applications54 (1996–17)
Units sought43
Approval rate45%
London rank#1677 of 16,342
Related investigations
How every developer ranks →
Approval rate, units sought and borough coverage across London developers, consultants, officers and inspectors.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
  2. [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.