Developer · London
Royal Mail Group.
A developer bringing schemes forward across London. Has 49 applications in 19 boroughs, seeking 1,362 residential units, at a 98% approval rate, 2003–23.[1] Where they build, and how, is below.
Developer1,362 units sought19 boroughs98% approval
Where they build — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore applications
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →49
Applications
London 2003–23
—
Avg S106 / unit
awaits s106 ingestion
Why a developer? They appear as both applicant (49) and agent (20); the name reads as a developer / housebuilder, so we list them as a developer and note the applications they fronted as agent.Something not right? Claim · Correct · Merge
Is this your developer?This profile is built from public planning records. Claim it to add your intro, logo and project images.
Approval rate over time — improving or slippingtheir London-wide rate by year
What they build — by scheme type
Click a slice to reshade the London map by that type.
Their planning record — policies in play
The policies most in play across this developer's schemes — how often each appears, and how often a scheme citing it wins consent.
Policies are coded from each officer report and decision notice — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. No policy record is shown until it's real.
Case officers — win rate when this developer submits
How often each named case officer grants consent on this developer's schemes. Pairing patterns from the public register — not endorsements.
The officer↔developer pairing isn't joined in the data layer yet — this table publishes when it is. Each borough's officers are already ranked in Track Records.
Applications by borough
Borough
Applications
Approval rate
Show all 19 rows
Where this developer builds, 2003–23.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough.
Outcomes secured — S106 by borough
S106 outcomes per unit aren't traced per developer yet — the borough-by-borough table publishes when the section 106 agreements and committee reports are ingested against this developer's consents.
Recent applications
Address
Borough
Type
Outcome
Date
City Of London
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2020-06-18
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2019-04-17
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2018-01-29
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-09-05
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-09-05
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-31
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-25
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-11
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2017-07-05
Camden
Non-Material Amendments
Approved
2017-05-02
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Refused
2017-03-28
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-12-23
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2016-04-18
Lambeth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2016-02-04
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2015-03-25
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-12-12
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
2014-06-09
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2014-02-11
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2014-02-11
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2013-09-05
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Split
2013-08-13
Newham
Non Material Change
Withdrawn
2013-08-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2013-06-07
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2013-06-05
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2013-05-29
Newham
Approval of Details
Approved
2013-05-20
Islington
Full Planning Application
—
2013-05-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2013-05
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-03-20
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2013-02-21
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-09-24
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2012-08-16
Islington
—
Approved
2012-08-16
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2012-05-22
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-06-02
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2011-05-17
Barking And Dagenham
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed Use)
Approved
2011-03-17
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-17
Barking And Dagenham
Lawful Development Certificate (Existing Use)
Approved
2011-02-15
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-01-12
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Withdrawn
2009-11-23
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2009-09-16
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2009-04
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-07-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Certificate of Lawfulness Proposed
Approved
2006-04-20
City Of London
Certificate of Lawfulness (Proposed)
Approved
2020-06-18
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2019-04-17
Show all 60 rows
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2018-01-29
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-09-05
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-09-05
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-31
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-25
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2017-07-11
Brent
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2017-07-05
Camden
Non-Material Amendments
Approved
2017-05-02
Lambeth
Non Material Change - Minor Amendment
Refused
2017-03-28
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2016-12-23
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2016-04-18
Lambeth
Variation of Condition
Approved
2016-02-04
Hounslow
PF-Full Applications
Approved
2015-03-25
Lambeth
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2014-12-12
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Approved
2014-06-09
Waltham Forest
Full Planning
Approved
2014-02-11
Waltham Forest
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2014-02-11
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2013-09-05
Bexley
Advertisement Consent Application
Split
2013-08-13
Newham
Non Material Change
Withdrawn
2013-08-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2013-06-07
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2013-06-05
Bexley
Details pursuant to Planning Condition
Approved
2013-05-29
Newham
Approval of Details
Approved
2013-05-20
Islington
Full Planning Application
—
2013-05-01
Camden
Full Planning Permission
Withdrawn
2013-05
Bexley
Detailed Planning Application
Approved
2013-03-20
Islington
Non-Material Amendment
Approved
2013-02-21
Islington
Approval of Details
Approved
2012-09-24
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2012-08-16
Islington
—
Approved
2012-08-16
Islington
Advertisement Consent
Approved
2012-05-22
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-06-02
Islington
Full Planning Application
Approved
2011-05-17
Barking And Dagenham
Lawful Development Certificate (Proposed Use)
Approved
2011-03-17
Barking And Dagenham
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2011-03-17
Barking And Dagenham
Lawful Development Certificate (Existing Use)
Approved
2011-02-15
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2010-01-12
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Withdrawn
2009-11-23
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2009-09-16
Brent
Conditions pursuant to a full permission
Approved
2009-04
Merton
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2007-07-13
Hammersmith And Fulham
Certificate of Lawfulness Proposed
Approved
2006-04-20
Consultants they instruct— subscriber data
At a glance
DeveloperRoyal Mail Group
Coverage19 London boroughs
Applications49 (2003–23)
Units sought1,362
Approval rate98%
London rank#261 of 16,342
Who decides here
Related investigations
Sources & method
- [1]Applications, approval rate, borough breakdown and units — the planning applications across London on which this company is the named applicant, from borough planning registers. Individual householders are excluded. Units = residential units conservatively parsed from each proposal (sought, not delivered); not every scheme states a count. · methodology
- [2]Agents — the named planning agent on each of this developer’s applications, joined to the London consultant record. · methodology
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.